-180 Yes, History can be interesting at times, but it shouldn't be an required to take because no one really needs it in life. amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you wont need to know how a cell operates or how to find the surface area of a octagonal prism or some such shape either.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

thats science sweetpea.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no, really??

by Anonymous 13 years ago

surface area is math sweetpea. and no shit they werent talking about history how would you compare not needing to know history with not needing to know history

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You don't think you need to know history? Is everything before you irrelevant? I hate history, though I am good at it, and I understand it's importance.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No one needs it in real life?!?! Hello?? Politics?!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

just because you don't want to learn anything about history doesn't mean that people won't need it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I kind of agree. I don't think History should be required, just that people should learn it on their own, but since no one actually would then you should be required to take it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

fuck you. have you heard of voting?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

History repeats itself over and over again.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

People who think like this are the reason behind the decline (future or present) of the Western Civilization-if you even know what that is.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kent-greenfield/12-laws-tea-partiers-woul_b_845922.html#s261985&title=The_Supremacy_Clause If these people had studied their history, they would know why the Supremacy Clause was put in and why it was so important. That goes for a lot of the other items in that list, too. Ignorance has very serious consequences.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

She works for Big Brother.

by Anonymous 13 years ago