-14 Sucker Punch deserves more than 20% on Rotten Tomatoes, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Oh my gosh. That movie was just so... disturbing. But a good kind of disturbing.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I usually don't trust the 'critics' score on Rotten Tomatoes because they're all just grumpy old men, the audience rating is more accurate to me

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That movie was terrible... I still really liked it though.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It should receive less. I went into that move wanting to like it and thinking it would be really good, and it just failed completely.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That movie was disappointing. I love Zack Snyder, but the movie was awful. Visually stunning, though.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Don't worry, Sucker Punch has more than 20% on Rotten Tomatoes.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It has 23%!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

back when i wrote the post it was 20%

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I really don't get why people dislike it so much. It was a movie that was really confusing. It was a delusion in a delusion. I really liked it. Plus it was visually stunning. TBH, I don't pay attention to IMDB or Rotten Tomato scores anymore. They're either by film-critics who only want films like what can be found at Sundance or by people who just want to watch explosions and prefer not to think during movies.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

My favorite movie right now. It was amazing, the whole storyline and the visual effects. I don't get what's not to like. Even the music is incredible (though it's mostly covers).

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I went into that movie expecting it to be terrible, then I saw it and I was like "INCEPTION!" As an aspiring film writer, I looked into it more than other people probably did, and I liked it because A. The story was believable. B. It executed ingeniously. I loved the way each girl had their own fantasy of how the house worked, and how we got to see each one, how we had to think. I hate movies where you don't need a brain to understand. This one fascinated me so much, I spent hours trying to analyze it. And I liked it for that. ...Yep. C. The ending...oh the ending. D. It made me feel. If a movie doesn't make me feel, its a crap movie. This is how I judge. E. I like how Vanessa Hudgens got to be a little more badass, and wasn't completely terrible. I'm glad she's moving on from Disney, 'cause I always liked her. (Just not her characters or singing) F. I liked how metaphorical it was. It made it seem to have much more meaning. G. The music was awesome. H. The effects were great. I. I loved the bad guy. He was funny yet terrifying. J. I like how the "dance" teacher was the mom from Spy Kids. That's all I can think of. I'd probably write movies like this when I'm older, so I h...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It was horrible, yes it was visually stunning, great graphics. Horribly executed. I don't understand how people can think this movie is confusing? It was less confusing than Inception (and that movie wasn't that confusing imo) The worst part of it was....she can do a dance that completely distracts a guy so much they can just steal shit right in front of them? Their job is to make sure they don't steal shit. And also you never even see her dance, all she does is sway back and forth like a tree in the wind. It's utter bull shit. The only good thing about the movies were the visual aspect, everything else made me feel like they were explaining this movie to 11 year olds.

by Anonymous 12 years ago