-218 They should make pants with built-in underwear, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That would be awkward.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Like changing in the locker room.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

definitely!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

But then the victoria's secret catalouges will start to suck!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Then I would have to wash my pants everytime I wear them.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

This makes me think of my Kelly Dolls.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I am pretty sure they exist actually. They shouldn't, but I think they do.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Running shorts.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I still wear underwear with mine that have it built in, unless I'm doing hardcore exercising. It just seems creepy.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

lol I do too. I'm actually not a big fan of them and I would like the shorts better if they weren't there. But oh well :)

by Anonymous 12 years ago

lol this is funny from my point of view, cuz here in east anglia pants ARE underwear, and those other things are called trousers xD so to me its really silly you saying that. its like saying underwear should have built in underwear

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Underwear with built in underwear would be the dawn of the future.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

aye that it will xD

by Anonymous 12 years ago