-218
They should make pants with built-in underwear, amirite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
That would be awkward.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Like changing in the locker room.
by Anonymous12 years ago
definitely!
by Anonymous12 years ago
But then the victoria's secret catalouges will start to suck!
by Anonymous12 years ago
Then I would have to wash my pants everytime I wear them.
by Anonymous12 years ago
This makes me think of my Kelly Dolls.
by Anonymous12 years ago
I am pretty sure they exist actually. They shouldn't, but I think they do.
by Anonymous12 years ago
Running shorts.
by Anonymous12 years ago
I still wear underwear with mine that have it built in, unless I'm doing hardcore exercising. It just seems creepy.
by Anonymous12 years ago
lol I do too. I'm actually not a big fan of them and I would like the shorts better if they weren't there. But oh well :)
by Anonymous12 years ago
lol this is funny from my point of view, cuz here in east anglia pants ARE underwear, and those other things are called trousers xD
so to me its really silly you saying that. its like saying underwear should have built in underwear
by Anonymous12 years ago
Underwear with built in underwear would be the dawn of the future.
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago