-265
You don't actually know what E=mc^2 stands for, amirite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
by Anonymous12 years ago
you jk rite?
by Anonymous12 years ago
That is why there is Google X)
by Anonymous12 years ago
Never took physics?
by Anonymous12 years ago
i'm in ap physics. took honors last year. not in the curriculum.
by Anonymous12 years ago
That's weird. then again different states have different curriculums.
by Anonymous12 years ago
And your teacher never even mentioned it in passing? I've been in physics for half a year and it's been talked about multiple times.
by Anonymous12 years ago
nope
by Anonymous12 years ago
Really? I took Honors Physics (complete joke class didn't learn anything) but we had to do equations with E, m, and c all the time. Didn't you at least know what E and m stood for?
by Anonymous12 years ago
yeah, but c eluded me. I guess we did learn about c during the light and optics unit....
by Anonymous12 years ago
Am I the only one who knows that this equation is wrong? It the single most misconceived piece of physics in history.
by Anonymous12 years ago
There's probably another formula that we've never even heard of?
by Anonymous12 years ago
it's the true form of equation, widely ignored due to the ignorance and low level maths of the general public
by Anonymous12 years ago
The equation isn't wrong it's just an altered form of the one he originally thought of.
by Anonymous12 years ago
no, the equation is wrong, having mass signified as 'm' is wrong, as for it satisfy that equation is must have a subscript 0 to signify it is at rest velocity. Also, there should have been at ± sign infront as the original equation has an E^2, so when rooted to derive E = ±mc^2, therfore E=mc^2 should be E=±m(subscript zero)c^2. So it is wrong.
Wasn't it also disproved as well, considering neutrinos move faster than the speed of light?
by Anonymous12 years ago
no, 1. That data is yet to be varified, 2. There are other theories including neautino's such as they travel at a different geometry to light. 3. Einsteins equation is working well so far
by Anonymous12 years ago
Anyone else read this as: "You have Down Syndrome, amirite?"
by Anonymous12 years ago
Wow I am just an absolutely mean spirited person. Ah well
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago
by Anonymous 12 years ago