-32 Stars that started existing millions of years ago must sort of just pop into our night sky every once in a while since light takes so long to travel, amirite?

by Gulgowskikennet 1 week ago

Huh, so the takeaway is that space is big but the stuff we can see is kinda close.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Nah, the takeaway is that space is big, and there's faint stuff nearby (stars), bright stuff far away (Andromeda Galaxy), faint stuff very far away (other galaxies), and very-very far away stuff that's somehow everywhere (cosmic background)

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Hmm, doesn't pack quite the punch

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Betelgeuse...

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Don't you dare say that two more times.

by Famous_Row 1 week ago

Does it count if someone else in the same area says it once? Betelgeuse.

by Iliana38 1 week ago

Betelgeuse (just to be sure)

by Anonymous 1 week ago

The farthest individual star we can see with our naked eye if we look up into the night sky is only about 15,000 light years away, so that light takes 15,000 years to reach us. We can see the andromeda galaxy with the unaided eye 2.5 million light years away, but we wouldn't be able to see an individual star light up in it, which happens several times per year. We can see a lot more stars with a telescope, but the farthest star in our galaxy takes their light less than 100,000 years to reach us. With a really really good telescope, we can see individual stars in other galaxies, like in andromeda.

by Away-Ad 1 week ago

We would still see the initial formation. Light from when it was an accretion disk would hit us before light from the star.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

That's what she said

by Anonymous 1 week ago