+916

Who decided pink was for girls and blue was for boys anyway? amirite?

99%Yeah You Are1%No Way
wobbuffets avatar
Share
8 12
The voters have decided that wobbuffet is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

Actually, until the early 20th century pink was for boys. It was thought of as a light shade of red, which represented strength and power. (This fact of the day is brought to you by JustASmallTownGirl.)

@JustASmallTownGirl Actually, until the early 20th century pink was for boys. It was thought of as a light shade of red, which...

exactly what i was going to say. Red was also used for men because it was the colour of blood and therefore the colour for strength. It was latter changed to pink because it was believed to be a lighter shade of see and hence well lighter and less obvious. Blue was considered the colour for women and as you said it was much later that they swapped! :)

This is so annoying during school. Especially in Elementary through Middle. ugh.

Agent_Romanovas avatar Agent_Romanova Yeah You Are +10Reply

Actually the ancient Chinese did. Blue was believed to keep evil spirits away, and the boys were considered more valuable than the girls, so the boys wore blue. Sexism goes back a looooong way. But no one really knows why they chose pink for girls.

Anonymous +3Reply

Originally, (early 1900's) pink was considered for boys since it was a washed-out red, which symbolized courage, and blue was for girls because it was daintier. But then they got switched around. :P

Anonymous +3Reply

Recent studies on new-born babies have shown that girls are slightly more attracted to pink, and boys are more attracted to blue. No one knows why. I think it's bizarre!

Your mom.

Anonymous 0Reply

Blue's my second favourite colour. :D

Lol, pink's one of my favorite colors. Here's the guitar of Alexi Laiho, guitarist and vocalist for Children of Bodom. Image in content

Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.