Okay I had to read that two or three times because at first I thought you were telling us to say "chicken" when we eat.
So Voldermort is a unicorn.
Oh my Rowling... Me too. I actually said "Chicken" several times out loud trying to figure it out because the rest of the post was too long and I was lazy facepalm
I thought that too!
I wll under one condition: promise me that all of my wildest dreams will come true.
puts my right hand on your left shoulder I can't make that promise. But I can give you 5 Internet points.
I eat chicken, therefore I am chicken.
Nice grammar and spelling.
~Your friendly neighborhood Grammar Hitler.
When I read this, I was hearing Bill Nye's voice.
BILL NYE THE SCIENCE GUY. I really dislike him. :/
This is funny because of that fact that your username is "PhilosophicalPizza"
But you also asked to homepage this post.
I am torn.
I agreed only because I want this internet points O__O
I am hot cheetos .
nucleus, not nucleas
That's so Billy.
If your dna matched the code of the chicken and spread that to every cell, then yes. But, i don't have a chicken's genetic code, so no. You are retarded.
then wouldn't humans all be cannibals?
No. You are what you eat, not you eat what you are. There's a difference.
well if we are what we eat, then we can only be humans if we ate humans amirite?
not all humans eat humans.
It's nuclei not nucleases, you idiot. Trying to sound smart doesn't work when you get it wrong.
No, the enzyme is called nuclease. You are obviously trying to sound smart by correcting someone, but sorry, it didn't work.
@508402 (LittleMexico): This is ironic because it is spelled NUCLEUS.
(Grammar Nazi VII): No, it's not. The enzyme is spelled nuclease, nucleus is something completely different.
yeah, you totally did. It was on here. We still saw it.