+503
Singers shouldn't have to be beyond gorgeous. Their job is to sing, not look good, amirite?
by Anonymous13 years ago
Not many people want to watch an ugly singer sing in their music videos.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Not many people want to hear crap in their music videos either.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Since when does beauty have to do with quality of voice? Anyway, if you don't like the song or artist you don't have to listen. It's really a simple concept.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Were you not hinting that you would rather listen to bands whose lead singer is hot? I'm not trying to be condescending/ignorant, I just couldn't interpret how you meant your first comment to be taken.
by Anonymous13 years ago
No, I was saying that if there are two bands that are equal in talent the one with the more attractive members is going to do better.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Oh, well then in that case I agree, and if that was what you meant the whole time, then I apologize for taking that the wrong way.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Haha, no problem.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Susan Boyle.
by Anonymous13 years ago
The Beatles...
by Anonymous13 years ago
are pretty attractive
by Anonymous13 years ago
Eh... They had... stages. John looked better when he shaved, George looked better when he cut his hair, and Ringo.... He looks better now, at 70. They looked okay, but they weren't gorgeous, yet they managed to be a rather promiscuous bunch.
by Anonymous13 years ago
Unfortuately, many more people will listen to and buy a singer's music if they're attractive. The record companies know this. It's shallow, but you can't deny that it's true.
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago