+240
you can stop a war with guns but you cannot stop the wars, amirite?
by Anonymous14 years ago
when you win a war with a gun you only show that you submit you dont make the other agree :D (i wanna start a debate!!!!!!!!)
by Anonymous14 years ago
this makes absolutely no sense to me
by Anonymous14 years ago
So...you can end a war by winning, but you can't end fighting? I don;t get it either.
by Anonymous14 years ago
Well if you took away the guns, there wouldn't be war in the first place.
by Anonymous14 years ago
I can't believe enough people understood this post for it to get on the homepage.. I don't understand it all.
by Anonymous14 years ago
i thought it was some kind of inside joke...
by Anonymous14 years ago
No it basicly means that while for example second world war was won with guns, you bring peace and its only temporary because 1) you havent convinced the other party that you were right you just submitted them and 2) you show that the gun can win a war and spread their use.
But in one longer sentence even if you can win a war by using force, you can't end them definitively because another one will always pop up
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago
by Anonymous 14 years ago