+240

you can stop a war with guns but you cannot stop the wars, amirite?

94%Yeah You Are6%No Way
inpersons avatar
Share
0 9
The voters have decided that inperson is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

this makes absolutely no sense to me

Anonymous +4Reply

when you win a war with a gun you only show that you submit you dont make the other agree :D (i wanna start a debate!!!!!!!!)

inpersons avatar inperson Yeah You Are +2Reply

I can't believe enough people understood this post for it to get on the homepage.. I don't understand it all.

Anonymous +2Reply
@fortunecookiemonster i thought it was some kind of inside joke...

No it basicly means that while for example second world war was won with guns, you bring peace and its only temporary because 1) you havent convinced the other party that you were right you just submitted them and 2) you show that the gun can win a war and spread their use.

But in one longer sentence even if you can win a war by using force, you can't end them definitively because another one will always pop up

inpersons avatar inperson Yeah You Are 0Reply

So...you can end a war by winning, but you can't end fighting? I don;t get it either.

Anonymous 0Reply

Well if you took away the guns, there wouldn't be war in the first place.

Anonymous 0Reply
This comment was deleted by its author.
@631242

Yes but alot less deadly

inpersons avatar inperson Yeah You Are -1Reply
Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.