As long as the parents are in agreement, I think it's fine.
Why is it?
Eh, hard to say. I don't think a lot of 16 year olds would actually put a lot of thought into their tattoo and get something that means something. Most of the people that have them that I know have pretty stupid ones.
I think it's fine if they get one, but most I see at that age are ugly, tacky and amateur.
when I have kids i'm gonna let them tattoos, but they'd have to put at least a year of thought into it and have me approve it, after all it's up to the parents
I got my first one when I was 12 on a cruise to Mexico, and I got my second one at 14
i got my first when i was 14 then my next a month later for my 15th birthday and im getting my third soon and most likely ill be 16 still. age has nothing to do with getting a stupid tattoo ive seen several "adults" with way more immature tattoos.
eh i got mine when i was 17
I don'tthink I should control anyone's life so I would just say have the kid put a lot of thought into it and let the parent decide since they still are legally in charge, but if they grow alot it might stretch
You might regret it.
And how does age come into that?
How does it not?
What is the difference between a 16 year old regretting a tattoo and a 30 year old regretting one? Because i don't know.
Well done captain obvious, perhaps I should promote you to private irrelevant.
That would be a demotion >.>
ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer