He didnt die. He was murdered. Beatles for life. Best band ever hands down.
He isn't an unoriginal fuck. In fact, he's an original unfuck.
i think it's because someone shot him. just sayin...
because he was a hypocritical douche, do some research. read some stuff about how much he owned. try watching the killing of john lennon.
Listen asshole, there's no way in hell you know more about John Lennon than me. He was a great fucking man.
take some time to actually educate yourself man. this was a 2 second google to verify what i was saying.
"'Dad was a hypocrite. He could talk about peace and love to the world but he could never show it to his wife and son'
Julian Lennon has many reasons to be angry."
so you listen asshole, how can someone sing about how great the world be with no money, yet own several mansions?
so yeah, there is a way in hell that anyone who takes time to read something unbiased, watch something that gives you facts knows more about John Lennon, youre probably just another teenage beatles fan boy. get over yourself.
Calm the fuck down. You don't like John Lennon. We get it. Your opinion isn't that important. Go do something useful.
Then why'd you comment?
To try to get you to shut up, possibly.
Hm, then replying probably wasnt your best bet seeing as how i hadnt said anything after i proved my point
Well, I guess if it means you stop advertising your hate on the internet, sorry to bother. Carry on being quiet.
again with the reply eh? if youre trying to get me to stop talking, that's kind of counter-productive,
Did you even...read the reply? I was saying sorry, get over yourself.
yet another reply....
Do you even read them? You must be socially retarded bro. How about this: you don't reply to this one. See through your evident lack of intelligence and read this comment. It's a finale. And get your empty head out of your dumb ass, kid.
PS Since that was probably waaay too much for you to read, the point is, don't reply.
I mean..my comment was supposed to be an end to this conversation man, how stupid do you have to be to not understand that it means "Hey, glad we cleared this up, if you're going to stop with the hate, then alright, cool".
well if you wanted it to be an end to the conversation, why do you keep conversing? its kind of contradictory.
And the hypocrite replied.
Can you try not to reply to this one? Can you do it? I will guess yes and hopefully, I will get no notification from some homeless douchebag like yourself trying to act superior on the internet. God, your parents must hate you.
HOMELESS DOUCHEBAGZ RAGING ON TEH INTERWEB
Can't read, can you?
you caught me, im completely illiterate
That's funny. Hilarious, actually. Because there's no way anyone who knew shit about me would call me "another fan boy.". Because I took the time to fully educate myself on the good and the bad. He was flawed, but he didn't hide them, and he donated a lot of time and energy to helping his causes. It's not about how much he had after his donations. He was in the most popular band of all bloody time, of course he's rich. He kept so much of his money because he knew he was likely to become poor anytime, and whether it's good or bad, people do need money. He was a philosopher and a business man, and he wasn't about to let either of those traits hurt each other. Also, for future refference, there's no such thing as unbiased news.
Did I say unbiased news? Pretty sure Lennon hasn't been in the news for years. And you pretty much just admitted he was a hypocrite, fanboy.
You said read something unbiased. Anything relevant would be news. I guess I just assumed you were smarter than you are. That one's my bad. I didn't admit he was hypocritical, I admit he did what is nearly impossible. He managed to be a great business man and philosopher WITHOUT being a hypocrite. That's one of his best features. And maybe I am a Beatles fanboy, if that's a bad thing. I'm a big fan of many things.
he talked about love and peace, his own family was in bits and peices and would ignore some of his children, he talked about how the world would be better with no money, yet owned way more than anyone needed. he contradicted himself, thats the definition of a hypocrite. AND news is anything recent and important, which john lennon is neither.
this is what a writer from the times said about him. "Lennon was a wife-beater, an anti-Semite, a bully and just a nasty piece of work in general. When 'Imagine' came out he had a closet full of white fur coats. He was a hypocrite. I also think that not only was Paul McCartney a better musician but Ringo Starr was too. I got so much flak for writing that he was a nasty piece of work, but lots of people have said similar things since."
are you implying that those 'unoriginal fucks' deserve death more than john lennon. if that's what you were saying you are a sick and twisted elitist/supremacist. congrats Hitler...