Don't Have An Account?
The voters have decided that this post is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also about win and fight
+409The wise win without a fight, while the ignorant fight so that they can win, amirite? Also about win and fight
-27You can fight without ever winning, but never ever, win without a fight, amirite? Also about win and fight
+94The best way to win a fight is to resolve the situation without one, amirite?
*you'd
I don't get it, what would the contraction be? You would or you had? Either way I don't think it makes sense.
It can take the form of either you would or you had depending on the context of the sentence. E.G. You'd be better off with this jacket instead of that one OR You'd better win that fight.
You had better win the fight, because if you won it would be better, I guess. I don't know, that's just the way I was taught.
my bad. you're right
Eh, this post seems obvious to me. It's kinda like saying, "If you want to live, you'd better breathe". Well, no flippin duh. I think the more useful saying would be, "If you start a fight with someone, you'd better be ready to finish it"
(i'm the poster btw) i was thinking of this girl at my school who started a fight with someone else and lost. how embarassing, right?