Yeah, but if you fuck up at sex (no puns intended) you're not just ruining your life (by possibly catching stds), but ruining your unborn kids... nothing good will happen if you're 14 and you're pregnant. You'll either abort, give it away (like we need more of that in our society) or you won't be good at raising it.
I mean do you know how many kids are in foster homes or in adopted? Don't you think it's kinda fucked up that their parents are just out there having more sex and putting more kids out in the street?
Making it illegal would probably make it more popular, kinda like what happened with prohibition. :P and people that are all for no sex probably are the ones who haven't experienced its greatness lol just sayin'.....
That's like saying the Bible isn't just for getting to know God better, it can AlSO be a paper weight... yeah well unfortunately you're not doing it right if that's what you use it for, even though you can. Besides once you pass the test you can fuck all day and all night... it's for counter measures, that you need this test.
Really though, if you think about how much abortion happens and how much kids have kids without having any hopes of being able to raise one or adults who're just going to give kids away, as soon as they're born and assuming that we're in a world where people obeyed the law, I think this is a pretty good idea. I do realize people wouldn't follow this, because it's kinda ridiculous, but I don't see where the harm in this idea is.
I do agree with ya there, but I reckon if any hypothetical situation would be ideal, it would be the one where people are kept sterile unless they pass the test, rather than be expected to be abstinent.
But, yeah, although it's impossible, if it were possible, some sort of test should be put in place - you have to pass a 100% driving test to be allowed a learner's licence, yet any redneck with a reproductive system gets to raise a kid.
i get that, and its awful what happens to kids, i agree with you. but people have been having sex since the dawn of time, and nothing is gonna keep it from happening. mostly, i think, we should focus on ways to keep people who do not want kids from having them.
thats ridiculous. how are you supposed to study for that? you cant! because even people who are married and are trying for kids don't know 100% that they'll be good parents, nobody does! its not a science, its a feeling. buy a condom and get over yourself.
well my main thing is that I went on a mission trip to a childrens home and some of those kids have gone through so much because of their parents. There are so many sad stories and if there was some way for them to learn to be better parents it might not be as bad. By "suFficient" I meant they aren't going to scar their kids for life by locking them in a closet for a week or something.
I propose that instead of testing to show youwill be sufficient parents, creating parenting classes (not the birthing and babies classes already offered). These parenting classes should be required (and provided free of charge) to all parents before their child reaches a certain age.
There are tons of classes for soon-to-be parents telling them how to handle babies. I was suggesting classes for how to handle your kids once they start becoming a little more indestructible (and rebellious).
I kinda have to agree with this and we can make the penalty for having under age sex, death by guillotine. I mean we can make the world a more moral place, while doing population control, two birds one stone (which is actually kinda a disgusting porno)!
Well... maybe, but I like killing people so, that's the next best way for me to get to kill people, without having to go to war and risk possibly getting killed :3
Disagree that sex should be considered just a means for reproduction, rather than a celebration of couplehood or a means for pleasure.
Yeah, but if you fuck up at sex (no puns intended) you're not just ruining your life (by possibly catching stds), but ruining your unborn kids... nothing good will happen if you're 14 and you're pregnant. You'll either abort, give it away (like we need more of that in our society) or you won't be good at raising it.
I mean do you know how many kids are in foster homes or in adopted? Don't you think it's kinda fucked up that their parents are just out there having more sex and putting more kids out in the street?
There's this thing called contraception..
You make it sound like if you have sex you will definitely have a kid. Its called birth control.
Barely anyone would pass.
And besides, people love it so that they would do it illegally just to do it. You can't stop people from having sex!
How about someone develops a condom that is permanent condom that is permeable to urine but not to semen..?
I agree that maybe young kids shouldn't be having sex but fact is they will have sex no matter what you do even if its illegal or not.
Making it illegal would probably make it more popular, kinda like what happened with prohibition. :P and people that are all for no sex probably are the ones who haven't experienced its greatness lol just sayin'.....
That's stupid.
I'm gay, does this mean I need to take a test to have sex with my partner, even though neither of us are capable of getting pregnant?
My girlfriend and I can't reproduce. Do we need to take the test too? We've already screwed, but if the test is free I'll take it.
Yeah, I'd like to take it.
Also, I think people need to realise sex is more than just penis-in-vagina penetration - and nor should it be considered as purely for reproduction.
I just like sex. I've never once had a penis in my vagina and I don't want one. I hear gay sex is better anyway.
That's like saying the Bible isn't just for getting to know God better, it can AlSO be a paper weight... yeah well unfortunately you're not doing it right if that's what you use it for, even though you can. Besides once you pass the test you can fuck all day and all night... it's for counter measures, that you need this test.
Mate, I like you coz you're funny and always point out flaws in people's arguments, but sometimes you just spout the weirdest shit.
Really though, if you think about how much abortion happens and how much kids have kids without having any hopes of being able to raise one or adults who're just going to give kids away, as soon as they're born and assuming that we're in a world where people obeyed the law, I think this is a pretty good idea. I do realize people wouldn't follow this, because it's kinda ridiculous, but I don't see where the harm in this idea is.
I do agree with ya there, but I reckon if any hypothetical situation would be ideal, it would be the one where people are kept sterile unless they pass the test, rather than be expected to be abstinent.
But, yeah, although it's impossible, if it were possible, some sort of test should be put in place - you have to pass a 100% driving test to be allowed a learner's licence, yet any redneck with a reproductive system gets to raise a kid.
I reckon we've come to an understanding... mate.
Don't mock my proud inbred convict Australian heritage.
Check again, I'm mocking you MORE.
Oh and if we straights have to take this test, then it would be sexism not to make gays have to take it too!
i get that, and its awful what happens to kids, i agree with you. but people have been having sex since the dawn of time, and nothing is gonna keep it from happening. mostly, i think, we should focus on ways to keep people who do not want kids from having them.
I agree that maybe young kids shouldn't be having sex but fact is they will have sex no matter what you do even if its illegal or not.
thats ridiculous. how are you supposed to study for that? you cant! because even people who are married and are trying for kids don't know 100% that they'll be good parents, nobody does! its not a science, its a feeling. buy a condom and get over yourself.
well my main thing is that I went on a mission trip to a childrens home and some of those kids have gone through so much because of their parents. There are so many sad stories and if there was some way for them to learn to be better parents it might not be as bad. By "suFficient" I meant they aren't going to scar their kids for life by locking them in a closet for a week or something.
I propose that instead of testing to show youwill be sufficient parents, creating parenting classes (not the birthing and babies classes already offered). These parenting classes should be required (and provided free of charge) to all parents before their child reaches a certain age.
or during the pregnancy. Because can you say "shaken baby syndrome"?
There are tons of classes for soon-to-be parents telling them how to handle babies. I was suggesting classes for how to handle your kids once they start becoming a little more indestructible (and rebellious).
I kinda have to agree with this and we can make the penalty for having under age sex, death by guillotine. I mean we can make the world a more moral place, while doing population control, two birds one stone (which is actually kinda a disgusting porno)!
I know sex is a big deal and all, but don't you think DEATH penalty is a little too much as punishment?
Well... maybe, but I like killing people so, that's the next best way for me to get to kill people, without having to go to war and risk possibly getting killed :3