People should leave Casey Anthony alone now, the trial is over, there was not enough evidence to put the woman away its sad but thats how it works in America, we dont want to jail a innocent person. Let Casey rebuild her life now. amirite?

Not when she uses our taxpayer dollars to pay for her own security.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Something you'd be entitled to also.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Casey owed me money. She kept searching "debt" on Google, but she misspelled it like 84 times and it said "death" instead. I think her keyboard is broken.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

she might not be a good person, but she is innocent until proven guilty

by Anonymous 13 years ago

yes thank you!

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes, and would you rather have a judicial system based on a jury or the media?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

SHE KILLED HER DAUGHTER! there is never a situation that would be ok in. then she tried to do it again? i feel bad for anyone she comes in contact with. seriously. who does that?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

How do you know that? She's innocent till proven guilty. We're not casey we dont know for sure. Have a nice day

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I like how you said "have a nice day" It makes you so much more civilized than the other commmenters lol.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually, nobody is innocent. They changed it from "innocent" to "not guilty" for a reason. There is no "innocent until proven guilty" anymore.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

What would you call the opposite of guilty?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

"Not guilty" is the term used in court. "Innocent" is not used in court anymore.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Yes, but couldn't one say that "innocent" is synonymous with "Not Guilty"?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

No. Technicley, yes. But just because you are not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, doesn't mean you're innocent. It just means, in court, that you could not be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Oh sorry, I misread. I thought you said "you couldn't say that..." Anyway, no you can't say that. In court you simply need to have reasonable doubt, that is not the same as being innocent. You are proven not guilty, but that doesn't make you innocent (also, nobody is innocent entirely).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

suck it mr not brave enough to put a name. she killed her daughter. whether she gets out of jail or not, she has to live with it for the rest of her life. not only was it illegal but morally wrong. but i guess you support murder

by Anonymous 13 years ago

she was proven Not Guilty, thank you to the comment above this one, and how.do you know she did?? Are you Casey?? For all we know maybe Caylee did drown.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

maybe you didnt get the memo but she was proven not guilty. there wasn't enough evidence for the court which means there's not enough evidence for you.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

and maybe you didnt get the memo that murder is wrong. duct tape over a childs mouth isnt an accident or a joke. theres nothing that the court could do that gives that woman what she deserves. its horrible.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

if she did it then why did a just find her not guilty on four very serious counts?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

*jury

by Anonymous 13 years ago

the jury can say whatever they want. that has nothing to do with it. i could say osama is still alive. it wouldnt make it true

by Anonymous 13 years ago

well you would be correct in calling this contrys court system inept.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The problem with these high profile cases is that everyone latches onto an idea that the Defense is either guilty or innocent, and regardless of the result believe the person to have or have not done the crime. Casey was found guilty long before the trial. Besides, even if she was guilty, it's not like she has any other daughters to potentially kill, she's not a threat to society.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

so what? The daughter accidently covered her mouth with ducktape and told her mom to leave her at home while she partied? Just because there wasn't enough evidence for the court doesnt mean she didn't do it. I could murder you and get proven not guilty but it doesn't mean I didn't murder you. I think you are sick in the head for thinking otherwise.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Sherlock Holmes's deduction only works in fiction because you cannot prove a negative.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Alrighty kids, let's review the American court system, shall we? Our system runs on facts and evidence, not emotions. It works that way for a reason. If your best friend murdered three people and the prosecution has stone cold evidence to prove him or her guilty, you testifying that he or she was really nice and that (s)he wouldn't do that because his/her character is good is ridiculous. Think about what would happen if we judged cases like that based on pure emotion. Sure, many think that she did indeed kill Caylee, but the problem is that people like Nancy Grace have driven it into our heads that we need to feel this emotional connection to Caylee. The quickest answer is the assumption that Casey did it, so when our emotions are challenged with reality, we turn to emotions. The truth is is that there is just not substantial evidence. That's all. My personal thought is that (because I do in fact believe in a God) she will pay for whatever she did in an afterlife, whether it was good or bad.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Here's the TL;DR version of this post: SMH.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Karma is a quaint and ridiculous notion.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The awkward moment when someone makes a very well-thought-out and valid point pertaining to the topic and some arsehole decides it's a good time to mock their spirituality.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm not, I'm mocking their use of it as a get-out

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Who said anything about karma? The post said "she will pay for whatever she did in an afterlife" Karma is a notion that has to deal with reincarnation, and the term "an afterlife" doesn't necessarily point to Hinduism. This person could have simply meant that on Judgement Day Casey Anthony, like the rest of us, will be judged by what we have done.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Karma in the very simplistic sense of good deed gets eye for an eye reward, bad deed gets eye for an eye punnishment.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'm aware of what karma asserts, but why did you post about it? No one said anything about karma.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

While I can't determine whether she killed her daughter or not, she was guilty of many things. She clearly neglected her daughter, I mean, she neglected to report her missing for how long? Something doesn't sit well with me about that. She shouldn't have gotten off scott free.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Actually, there was enough evidence to prove she killed her. The jury couldnt hear all the information. I dont know why, but they were not allowed.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The first line of this reminded me of the Leave Brittany Alone video... "LEAVE CASEY ALONE!"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

This reminds me of the people that still think mj was a paedophile.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

You know, there are hundreds of cases like this that don't get so publicized. I still don't understand why this particular one is such a big deal. Yes, it's sad that she died, but still. Why does she get so much more publication than other kids in her situation?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Innocent people don't give false information to the police.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is a reason why she was found not guilty. There was not enough evidence and the jury found her innocent. She deserves to continue her life and if she did kill her daughter, then she is the one who has to live with that guilt. She'll get what she deserves when she deserves it. People should just let her be because they only know what the media tells them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

She was never and will never be found "innocent."

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There is a reason why she was found not guilty. There was not enough evidence and the jury found her innocent. She deserves to continue her life and if she did kill her daughter, then she is the one who has to live with that guilt. She'll get what she deserves when she deserves it. People should just let her be because they only know what the media tells them.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Soo, I guess that dead body smell in her car was just her new air freshener?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no i dont follow murder cases usually. just a pet peeve of mine murdering your children. maybe its just me

by Anonymous 13 years ago

We have no right to judge Anthony, we have not been presented with the evidence that was provided in the court, what we have been informed may make her sound guilty, but we don't know what proved her innocent.

by Anonymous 13 years ago