The voters have decided that Nacklefoodle is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also by Nacklefoodle
+311In a perfect world, people don't know what it's like to cry from sadness, amirite? Also about talented
+13Luo Li Ron is amazingly talented. I wish I could afford to buy one of her pieces for my garden. Sculpture is becoming a lost art, amirite?
O.o
What. I'm just proving a point is all..
I know. There's nothing like proving someone wrong with an amirite post.
That would be why they're two different words.
This is true, but I'm embittered about that shitty POTD from a few days ago.
Oh but this isn't about that at all. I'm not trying to make one off that idea, I'm proving the point that the post http://amirite.net/620989 is completely wrong.
Especially this point http://amirite.net/620989/1358120
No, because no matter how little you practice, you will at first have more skill than a normal person would. This is why talent is called natural skill.
Talent is a bit like a head start to learning a skill; others start at 0 while talented start at +10.
Yeah he will. He will have learned to play better or will understand the music more well than the other guy. All the second guy will have is practice and nothing more, and while their performances might be equally as impressive, deep inside the first guy's the guy who's really better.
So since he started at a head start.. he won't be skilled at all? until 100?
Then he would be able to, to what? And what wouldn't make him skilled?
Are you even reading what you write, woman.
Lolwut, it's not like that at all. What a terrible analogy.
Anyway, they do not only start at +10 but they go x2 as fast and learn x2 as well (or more, considering how talented one is). They, overall, learn the activity better.
The chicken has laid his egg!