+276 If women want to fight for the equal right of being able to go topless in public like men, they shouldn't complain when they catch men staring at their breasts, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Assuming women were able to walk around topless in public, It's going to happen, especially in societies where breasts have been covered up for so long.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I'd rather not have equal rights to show our chests. Frankly, I don't think our chests are equal.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Me neither. I'm only speaking of those women who do want these "equal rights".

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I totally agree with you. I however, don't think that there should be totally equal rights as we're not the same.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The only reason we stare is because breasts are taboo, and we hardly ever see them. If they were a common sight, people wouldn't think twice about them. Sure, there would be an increase in staring for the first few weeks after the rule change, but after that we'd be more accepting. That's assuming, of course, that there's enough women willing to break the trend and be the first ones to go topless. Otherwise, cultural taboos would make the rule change essentially useless.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Ladies, if a sexy guy walked around topless would you stare at him? *Waiting...* *Waiting......* Exactly what I thought. Of course you would check him out! It's not because boobs or chests are taboo, it's because biologically we're attracted to them. I mean, dudes find a good rack attractive whether or not there's a shirt over it and it's certainly commonplace to see some boobs with a shirt over them. Why would this change if we took the shirt off?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's what I'm saying... only it would definitely be more than a few weeks. It would probably be years before guys stopped.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I know veeeeery few women who would like go around in public topless. In fact, I can think of zero.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I don't really understand why they're so taboo in the first place. Their purpose is to feed babies. That's definitely sexy.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Would you say vaginas and penises shouldn't be taboo either because "their purpose is to make babies"?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

But their purpose is also for pleasure.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Boobs are for pleasure too. Guys are very visual.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Like I state in my comment below, they're pleasurable to gaze upon because of our natural instincts.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's instinctive for men to be attracted to boobs because a woman with big boobs will provide more milk to her offspring.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

By topless, do you mean nothing at all or they can still have a bra on? I think it might get annoying for many women to have their tits flopping around everywhere.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Tell that to the feminists who think that "men are holding women down".

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Beleive me, I'm all for holding women down, in more than one sense. But, if these feminists want to hurt themselves by having their titties flopping round, they can try it. They sure don't wear bras because we want them to wear bras, they wear 'em so their knickers don't fall off.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

It's legal in my city, and no one does it (excluding the hippies at the nude beach).

by Anonymous 13 years ago

I prefer to keep my mounds of fat covered up...

by Anonymous 13 years ago

In Canada (o at least ontario) it is legal for women to go shirtless, but almost no one actually does it.

by Anonymous 13 years ago