+170

The Babylonian number system was based on sixty. You have no idea how they thought of sixty distinct names for each number, amirite?

93%Yeah You Are7%No Way
B10ckH34ds avatar
Share
0 2
The voters have decided that B10ckH34d is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
This user has deactivated their account.
@1517619

No. They just had more of the same symbol. I meant that they didn't have a different name like one, two and three as opposed to i ii and iii

B10ckH34ds avatar B10ckH34d Yeah You Are 0Reply
Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.