The Babylonian number system was based on sixty. You have no idea how they thought of sixty distinct names for each number, amirite?

93%Yeah You Are7%No Way
B10ckH34ds avatar
0 2
The voters have decided that B10ckH34d is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
This user has deactivated their account.

No. They just had more of the same symbol. I meant that they didn't have a different name like one, two and three as opposed to i ii and iii

B10ckH34ds avatar B10ckH34d Yeah You Are 0Reply
Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.