It's weird to think that you never really touch anyone, or anything because the electrons around the atoms of your body repel against the electrons of everything else. amirite?
Hahahaha I know it's impossible... that was the one piece of information that pissed me off the most in chem last year. I don't like being told that something is impossible; I'm wicked stubborn so my natural reaction would be to try and find a loophole or something. Then I just end up confusing the fuck out of myself.... xD
See that made me mad too, so I'm just taking it out on electrons in general, especially since we've gotten into bonding. Sometimes the electrons do this, sometimes they do that. Dang it electrons, why can't you make up your mind? (figuratively of course)
That's soo true. And what's with those fucking s/p/d/f shells and transferring and shit?! Like seriously, I passed that class but I still don't understand that AT ALL. Electrons suck -.-
And then my teacher is telling us about how there's so much stuff at the atomic level that physicists haven't figured out yet. If they can't get it right at the small level, then that'll screw everything up at the bigger levels (like compounds, molecules, etc). So my proposition is, "Until atomic physicists can get their shit together, we shouldn't have to learn any chemistry."
GAH EXACTLY.
like, what's the point if, say, they discover something that completely changes everything we learned? This may not be meant go with the situation but it still sort of makes sense: don't count your damn chickens before they hatch! -_____-
Einstein's theory of evolution has recently been proven false. (No joke, my mom's friend's son is a high-up, super smart scientist and his colleagues proved it wrong. )
Actually, my mom is involved in the experiments that said they proved the theory of relativity wrong. She says that they didn't have legamite evidence, and it's probably just all wrong.
From what I understood, it was really sketchy evidence that ended up undermining everything we have already proved in science. So I guess the evidence against the theory would be that the data they drew these conclusions from is wrong. If the data's wrong, then there's no proof that this is true, and it's pretty doubtful that shoddy conclusions can undermine everything we know.
Alright so here's the deal. Scientists at a particle accelerator in Switzerland shot neutrinos and photons (light) to a detector in Italy, and the neutrinos won, and that's what proves Einstein's theory wrong. But the results are sketchy because the particles ended up going through a mountain, and because the locations were so far away from each other, the straight line between the locations that the particles took was through the Earth itself.
I'd just like to also point out that this completely backs up my theory dealing with physicists really not knowing squat about particles and stuff, and therefore my theory should be accepted by the education board and be put into place RIGHT NOW so I don't have to take chemistry anymore.
I think its crazy how living things and non living things are made up of the exact same things. It makes me wonder what the difference is between atoms in people and atoms in a rock or something are.
Atoms in biotic things form cells, which are considered life because they meet qualifications, while abiotic things are just made up of molecules that don't form cells.
So since the word "touch" isn't possible, I say we rename it "repulsive-force-sense". That'd make court sessions sound so odd... like "Okay little Timmy, where did the priest repulsive-force-sensed you?"
"Touch" refers to one of our senses. This one being a response to the reaction between our nerves and whatever other object we come into "contact" with. Think about it, words such as "touch" and "contact," etc. aren't really defined as zero distance between a finger and a key. The "no distance between two objects" definition of touch is just something we came up with from observing.
So yeah, we actually are touching (actual definition) things, but at the same time we're not touching (observed definition) things. There we go, I fixed my world :D.
I was comforted at first when I read the first part... "It's weird to think that you never really touch anyone..", thinking, hey, I'm not the only one who doesn't have anyone! Then it went on about electrons.
Oh, then whatever you do, don't get that post as POTD. Cause if you do, then it's GONE! And I mean gone, when that mod deleted the POTD yesterday I couldn't even look at my comments from it anymore (which pisses me off cuz that occupy amirite comment was awesome).
Penn State tried telling that to the police, but that didn't work.
Most of everything is nothing. So if you had powerful and precise enough magnets you could walk through walls.
New life goal.
Have fun, seeing as it's impossible to tell the location of an electron. But walking through walls would be amazing so count me in.
Hahahaha I know it's impossible... that was the one piece of information that pissed me off the most in chem last year. I don't like being told that something is impossible; I'm wicked stubborn so my natural reaction would be to try and find a loophole or something. Then I just end up confusing the fuck out of myself.... xD
See that made me mad too, so I'm just taking it out on electrons in general, especially since we've gotten into bonding. Sometimes the electrons do this, sometimes they do that. Dang it electrons, why can't you make up your mind? (figuratively of course)
That's soo true. And what's with those fucking s/p/d/f shells and transferring and shit?! Like seriously, I passed that class but I still don't understand that AT ALL. Electrons suck -.-
And then my teacher is telling us about how there's so much stuff at the atomic level that physicists haven't figured out yet. If they can't get it right at the small level, then that'll screw everything up at the bigger levels (like compounds, molecules, etc). So my proposition is, "Until atomic physicists can get their shit together, we shouldn't have to learn any chemistry."
GAH EXACTLY.
like, what's the point if, say, they discover something that completely changes everything we learned? This may not be meant go with the situation but it still sort of makes sense: don't count your damn chickens before they hatch! -_____-
Einstein's theory of evolution has recently been proven false. (No joke, my mom's friend's son is a high-up, super smart scientist and his colleagues proved it wrong. )
Actually, my mom is involved in the experiments that said they proved the theory of relativity wrong. She says that they didn't have legamite evidence, and it's probably just all wrong.
Not having legitimate evidence doesn't make it wrong. It's a theory. Was there evidence against the theory?
From what I understood, it was really sketchy evidence that ended up undermining everything we have already proved in science. So I guess the evidence against the theory would be that the data they drew these conclusions from is wrong. If the data's wrong, then there's no proof that this is true, and it's pretty doubtful that shoddy conclusions can undermine everything we know.
Ok. I get what you mean now. I don't want to have everything I know changed. It makes my head hurt.
Alright so here's the deal. Scientists at a particle accelerator in Switzerland shot neutrinos and photons (light) to a detector in Italy, and the neutrinos won, and that's what proves Einstein's theory wrong. But the results are sketchy because the particles ended up going through a mountain, and because the locations were so far away from each other, the straight line between the locations that the particles took was through the Earth itself.
I'd just like to also point out that this completely backs up my theory dealing with physicists really not knowing squat about particles and stuff, and therefore my theory should be accepted by the education board and be put into place RIGHT NOW so I don't have to take chemistry anymore.
You're right. European scientists found that neutrinos can travel faster than light, and that ruins the theory of special relativity.
Wait, Einstein was the evolution guy? I thought it was Darwin.... but anyways, how'd they do it?!
*reletivity
*relativity.
Today is just not my day, amirite?
If by Einstein you mean Darwin youre still probably wrong
Bucket List: Meet Anthony
Bungee Jump
See the world
Walk through walls
You've got your priorities straight :D
Science can really screw with your head.
Please explain ._.
and no i'm not fucking mormon lol
Mormon:
http://ctrlv.in/46036
Don't wanna search "fucking mormon" on Google images...
So I'm never really touching the ground? If I lay down, do I become Superman?
You're already Superman.
MC Hammer was on to something
Forever alone...
I feel bad for electrons.. All the preppy protons and neutrons are hanging out at the nucleus and they're just by themselves..
That's why they're so negetive.
I guess they're just not in their element.
They're just negative because they're hipsters, then once it becomes mainstream you just get a giant, neutral mess.
It's a rather depressing thought too
I think its crazy how living things and non living things are made up of the exact same things. It makes me wonder what the difference is between atoms in people and atoms in a rock or something are.
And then science added quarks just to fuck with us
Atoms in biotic things form cells, which are considered life because they meet qualifications, while abiotic things are just made up of molecules that don't form cells.
So since the word "touch" isn't possible, I say we rename it "repulsive-force-sense". That'd make court sessions sound so odd... like "Okay little Timmy, where did the priest repulsive-force-sensed you?"
I'm smashing my finger on the table. Is it touching yet?
I just slammed my head on a rock.
Either it touched or my nerves are being douchebags.
What you talkin' bout? You god!
not yet. smash HARDER
It hurts (cry2)
Technically...no.
Well.... fuck
no... i don't think its the electrons. The only thing that keeps me from touching you is that restraining order.
When we learned that in science last year, as soon as the class got out there was just a huge chorus of "I'm not touching you~" in the halls. XD
I've always thought of that I was just to lazy to right it down/look it up lol
I hate when I'm too lazy to left something down
Sorry for just copying you, I read you're comment and just got it after I posted mine. I'm a r-tard
I'm a D-Tard nice to meet you sir.
Indeed a great pleasure. I've never met a celebrity before.
No that's D-List, not D-tard.
I see you're also too lazy to spell.
Did you just finish watching VSauce on Youtube....... ;D
Maybe I actually DO have that protective bubble everyone says I need...
I'm totally in denial about this. Anyone wanna make out?
sure! :D
So I'm levitating? Cool.
just because atoms repel, doesnt mean we dont force them to meet others, and since we feel it in our nerves, its kind of the definition of touch
No, technically you don't ever touch anything. The nerves are being affected are being affected because of the repelling force.
This made me feel quite lonely :(
which, is touch
I see you missed the reply button. So I guess it just depends on what you think touching something means.
Coulumb's (sp) law.
"Touch" refers to one of our senses. This one being a response to the reaction between our nerves and whatever other object we come into "contact" with. Think about it, words such as "touch" and "contact," etc. aren't really defined as zero distance between a finger and a key. The "no distance between two objects" definition of touch is just something we came up with from observing.
So yeah, we actually are touching (actual definition) things, but at the same time we're not touching (observed definition) things. There we go, I fixed my world :D.
I was comforted at first when I read the first part... "It's weird to think that you never really touch anyone..", thinking, hey, I'm not the only one who doesn't have anyone! Then it went on about electrons.
/forever alone
And it's called touching anyways so you are touching....
So saying " I'm not touching you" when you are a kid is technically correct?
FACK! FACK! Would you consider mine a repost? This one is original and I think I may have reposted.
http://amirite.net/668560
No you're doing it wrong. Wait til this gets POTD then report the repost so you get POTD.
It wasn't a prediction. He knew what would happen because he has a time macne.
Hahahaha. His came first, though.
Oh, then whatever you do, don't get that post as POTD. Cause if you do, then it's GONE! And I mean gone, when that mod deleted the POTD yesterday I couldn't even look at my comments from it anymore (which pisses me off cuz that occupy amirite comment was awesome).
Good. It's gone.
Thank you, thank you.
I hope it doesn't even get homepaged.
It's also really weird to think.
Damn hypothetical constructs.
So it WASNT rape if i didnt touch them right?
Arguably, the electrons are parts of the atoms which are parts of our bodies.
what about when something goes through you????
I got in trouble for sitting on a table at school today.
My comeback? "I'm not actually sitting on the table. I'm levitating."
So you watch Vsauce.
OOOO VSAUCER.
My friend said that the other day. I'm serious.
Well, "that" is a pretty common English word. I would be more surprised if your friend had said a word like "jumentous" or "xenobombulate".
Obviously a