+289 Cursive would be a lot quicker and more efficient if you didn't have to go back and dot your Is and Js and you didn't have to cross your Ts and Xs, amirite?
13 years ago
+289 Cursive would be a lot quicker and more efficient if you didn't have to go back and dot your Is and Js and you didn't have to cross your Ts and Xs, amirite?
13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago
by Anonymous 13 years ago