You don't actually know what E=mc^2 stands for, amirite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

you jk rite?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That is why there is Google X)

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Never took physics?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

i'm in ap physics. took honors last year. not in the curriculum.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

That's weird. then again different states have different curriculums.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

And your teacher never even mentioned it in passing? I've been in physics for half a year and it's been talked about multiple times.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

nope

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Really? I took Honors Physics (complete joke class didn't learn anything) but we had to do equations with E, m, and c all the time. Didn't you at least know what E and m stood for?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

yeah, but c eluded me. I guess we did learn about c during the light and optics unit....

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Am I the only one who knows that this equation is wrong? It the single most misconceived piece of physics in history.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

There's probably another formula that we've never even heard of?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

it's the true form of equation, widely ignored due to the ignorance and low level maths of the general public

by Anonymous 13 years ago

The equation isn't wrong it's just an altered form of the one he originally thought of.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no, the equation is wrong, having mass signified as 'm' is wrong, as for it satisfy that equation is must have a subscript 0 to signify it is at rest velocity. Also, there should have been at ± sign infront as the original equation has an E^2, so when rooted to derive E = ±mc^2, therfore E=mc^2 should be E=±m(subscript zero)c^2. So it is wrong.

by Anonymous 13 years ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=mkiCPMjpysc#t=115s

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wasn't it also disproved as well, considering neutrinos move faster than the speed of light?

by Anonymous 13 years ago

no, 1. That data is yet to be varified, 2. There are other theories including neautino's such as they travel at a different geometry to light. 3. Einsteins equation is working well so far

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Anyone else read this as: "You have Down Syndrome, amirite?"

by Anonymous 13 years ago

Wow I am just an absolutely mean spirited person. Ah well

by Anonymous 13 years ago