you see I just google imaged uggs the other day my brother asked if I was wearing uggs and I basically said "I dunno" and I saw it on your post right now so I googled imaged uggs and they're not ugly in my opinion they're comfortable looking and good for the snow especially this time of year as for price I don't know how much they cost my shoe wear doesn't cost more than 30 bucks unless they were a gift from someone and my boots were a gift from my Uncle he's bald by the way I just felt like pointing that out all my paternal Uncles are bald but all my maternal Uncles have a full head of hair so I'm wondering which side I'll get or would I be in the middle? like have thinning hair without the bald part

by Anonymous 10 years ago

They sound pretty damn good. Even still, I'd say the price is more for the label than the awesome quality of them. I kinda like the look though. It's like back in the day when the only type of headphones were the big, bulky kind except they're cooler now.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

They're not overpriced given the demand. Personally, I wouldn't pay that much for either product, but you also must consider how functional each is, however ugly. Uggs are really fucking warm. $200 worth of warm, I'm not sure, but it's not like paying $200 for foam flip flops. Beats are great at canceling out sound and do their job pretty well. It, again, isn't like throwing away $200 for some cheap-ass earbuds. So the two are comparable, I think, just not as worthless as you imply in the post.

by Anonymous 10 years ago