There wasn't enough time in The Hunger Games when things were normal (like in Harry Potter where they sit by the lake and visit Hagrid and stuff). Everyone was always in some awful situation, amirite?

+236 There wasn't enough time in The Hunger Games when things were normal (like in Harry Potter where they sit by the lake and visit Hagrid and stuff). Everyone was always in some awful situation, amirite?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Still better than Harry Potter

by Anonymous 12 years ago

But agreed

by Anonymous 12 years ago

The Hunger Games film was no where near as good as the book, for the reason stated in the post. They really rushed through it...

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Yet it was quite long of a movie. It wasn't that they had to fit everything possible in or something.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It's a different situation, a different position that the characters are placed in than Harry Potter. So no. In the confines of the world of The Hunger Games, in the position of Katniss, the way it's written not having much 'normal' time makes sense.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That's just the kind of writer Suzanne Collins is.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Also the Harry Potter books were long ass books. And there were 7 of them. The Hunger Games books were pretty short (like ~300 pages each) compared to HP, so they couldn't fit all that fluff in just 3 books.

by Anonymous 12 years ago