You're OK with movies omitting scenes/details for time, but it's annoying when random details are changed. Like in the movie Hermione explained what a mudblood was, but in the book she said she didn't know what it was but it sounded bad, amirite?

+175 You're OK with movies omitting scenes/details for time, but it's annoying when random details are changed. Like in the movie Hermione explained what a mudblood was, but in the book she said she didn't know what it was but it sounded bad, amirite?

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I totally agree with your example - Hermione did tons of research about the wizard world before she came to Hogwarts, and it seemed odd to portray her as not knowing that some people would consider her inferior for being Muggle-born, particularly as blood purity seemed to be a major argument in wizard history.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

OR WINKY! I wanted to see her in the story SO BAD!

by Anonymous 11 years ago

How Madge didn't even exist in The Hunger Games.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Leaving her out kind of took away all of the meaning of the mockingjay pin.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

Totally!

by Anonymous 11 years ago

honestly, that helped the audience understand the book more. people would have ended up talking during the movie if she didnt say what it was

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I'm pretty sure Hagrid explains it in the book. It wouldn't have changed anything if he had said the line instead of Hermione.

by Anonymous 11 years ago

I didn't say the book never said what it was and the movie randomly added it in. They made a different character say it in the movie than in the book.

by Anonymous 11 years ago