The voters have decided that LinksLegionaire is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also by LinksLegionaire
+284Some amirite posts seem like they were made to settle an argument between the OP and their friend, amirite?
Wreckless isn't a word. Even if it was, they wouldn't be antonyms...
wreck (n.) - any building, structure, or thing reduced to a state of ruin.
reckless (adj.) - utterly unconcerned about the consequences of some action. (Thus more likely to cause wrecks)
Take it with a grain of salt.
"Take it with a grain of salt."
I really dislike like expression. You are wrong, don't get upset when someone points it out and expect them to just accept it because you said so.
Read the tags. It's a joke.
Try to have a little joy in your life.
Oh, I have lots of joy in my life. This isn't a joke though.
"Why did the chicken cross the road?" is a joke.
Being blatantly grammatically incorrect is not a joke. Your "joke" is not funny in any sense of the word.
Wreck is a word. Wreckless isn't.
Disregarding that, someone can still be reckless and not cause any wrecks. It doesn't matter if it increases the chances- 'friendly' and 'solitary' aren't antonyms, even if being friendly decreases your chances of being solitary.
Antonyms are opposites like happy and sad or laser dolphin and zombie shark. And 'wreakless' still isn't a word.
Neither is "wreckless."
True.