The voters have decided that GiggityGoo22 is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also about food and cooking show
+54There needs to be a cooking show where the contestants are given the same base ingredients but can cook different dishes. And instead of your normal chefs, it will be three random grandmas from different corners of the world. There will be no winners or losers, just delicious food. amirite?
Also about TV, Movies & Theatre
-74In the movies, no one finishes a meal, a character just takes a few bites. Otherwise the scene would turn boring, amirite?
Also about food and cooking show
+198Sometimes, when you're home alone and you're cooking food, you pretend you're the host of a home cooking show, amirite?
You must also have the ability to describe food as, among other things: herbacious, enticing, titillating, and unpalatable.
I'm not really a fan of trying new foods so I'm going to have to disagree.
Unless all the food is terrible
You have to say more than "This is some good shit".
Except the reason (mostly) that the judges get that job is because they've been around food for many years and have trained themselves to detect and accurately identify what exactly makes something a quality meal. They have more than enough skill and experience where they're able to describe a food with much more helpful detail than, "Mmm!" and "Blech!" Thus making it an actually watchable experience.
unfortunately not all food critics are trained, or have been around food for a long time, some of them became food critics because they have a degree in journaslism
Hence the "mostly" part...
no way on master chef the other day the judges ate pork hearts and beef tongues.
I hate spicy stuff and on Chopped there have been some pretty spicy dishes. I would be like "How do I rate this meal because personally I hate it but professionally it might not actually be as bad as I think it is?"