No cherry blossom, that's not how it works. Male bodies are PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR. That is because evolution decided they had to be for survival. A female black widow spider eats and kills her male partner because her body is vastly physically superior. Sure the male spide is a great design and good for it's purpose, but the females is better. It is exactly the same here except we don't eat you (out of courtesy)
Ok but my metaphor wasnt meant to be pushed that much further, and the last part was a joke. You ignored the basis, which is that much like female spiders have physically superior bodies for a purpose, male homo sapien do as well. Doesnt make boys better than girls, it means we were made bigger better faster stronger or whatever because our purpose is to be. Males are better at being stronger is like females are better at giving birth, it's a generic predisposition based on evolution
Tiger argument as a female supremacy thing, but I think I'm being reasonable on that. The ONLY thing I dismissed as 'Who the hell cares' is the 1984 because I didn't see why knowing the year women started doing a marathon was relevant, but I see and 'understand' the point you wanted to get across now
I think you are missing the point. Females are more likely than males to get breast cancer, you can't say 'I judge a body's superiority based on which body can get breast cancer easier.' it's your right to judge it on that, but it's wrong. The male body is built to handle more physical stress and do things that require more strength due to muscle strength and bone density. In the evolutionary 'hunter gatherer' use of the word the male body was built superior in that it was built for the ability to survive better than the female. Not to say males are better than females or that female bodies don't have a great body for their purpose. But in a life or death situation males have been PHYSICALLY better equipped to survive.
This argument started to degrade after you started getting kind of 'feminazi' Ish. If you read the first few comments I was EXTREMELY tactful and understanding. I never implied women are weak. Put the average man and the average women in a cage with a tiger? You bet on the man, he has an evolutionary better chance of survival. It's as simple as that, that's the design. I also never said there are no strong women at all, your twisting my words. Also in the 18-42 category men have an average 3.8 higher IQ. I don't think it matters, and I don't think that makes it ok to boast men are smarter than women, but it's accurate. Also I don't get your marathon comment, it's pretty good she ran a marathon in 1984? A hundred years after men started doing it? Men are on average physically stronger, that has been my only point and you can't dispute it
A lot happened without me. Alright condensed final reply. If you don't judge SOLELY PHYSICAL superiority on athleticism then what do you judge it on? In my view every other physical part of our bodies is (more) specially engineered for a purpose and an argument of it would be futile. I see it as 'A mans body is physically superior' in the same way 'a woman's ability to multi task is mentally superior' both I view as true but, equality wise, irrelevant. I mentioned 100 years walker to combat your irrelevant year comment with an equally irrelevant year comment. I don't think either had point. I'm not saying men will never lose to women I'm saying they have genetic advantage not a 100 year advantage. A women could have the fastest marathon time but men could still be better at maraton than women through average. (I don't know or care I'd that's true). K the tiger thing isn't something I'm easily finding middle ground with. WITHOUT variables in the general sense it's understood a man would have better chance through, again, genetic advantage; just as easily as women have a well understood advantage to stop babies from crying. Not better just different. Haha ya I do kind of see your
I'm willing to bet that a man is fully capable of making a sandwich that is just as good if not better then a women's. But that depends, and I'm looking for an example outside of the stereotypical "cooking, cleaning, etc." type of thing.
You started getting yelly and dropping random acts of female athletacism, then you said women are smarter than men you just have to find the data. Thats kinda femanazi-Ish. That's not the point, let's say the tiger will only kill one, the average man has a better chance of survival. IQ level is pretty infallible. That's ok, you don't have to believe men are superior physically. I'm sure you will some day. You said that a women ran a marathon in 1984, my response was who the hell cares? Men did it 100 years earlier, who cares about that either.
A male could possibly stand a chance against a tiger, however unlikely it is, but a women stands absolutely no chance. I'm not trying to be mean, men are just naturally better physically then women.
But you'd take a bunch of different surveys and whichever one won the most would be "better."
So if an apple stays ripe longer, but oranges have a longer growing season and are easier to grow, they'd be considered the superior fruit.
And I'm no troll, I feel I've made rather good arguments to this point. As for the slavery post, please, allow me to quickly defend my point:
I believe in a more humane form of slavery, not the cruel type history has forced us to imagine. This type would be monitored, and you would need to have enough slaves to work in maximum shifts of 10 hours. The slaves would need to live in houses with enough bedding for all of them, along with AC and heating. But again, this isn't about slavery, I only explained that so as to maybe convince you to take me seriously.
Yes, if you were to take into account how long each stays ripe, how easy it is to grow them, what conditions they survive in etc.
I'm sorry, my name in no way is meant to imply anything about women being inferior--I'm just not good at making usernames and this had a nice ring to it.
And I'm not so much for slavery, I'm just saying that in the long run, if it benefits society, should it not be allowed? But this isn't a debate on slavery, so I'm not getting into that.
So at first I thought I was reading a conversation between two idiots. Then I thought I was reading a conversation between a troll and an idiot. Then some people with brains jumped in and I kinda lost track. The only thing that really stuck is that Equal is an idiot.
well I wasn't using it as an argument just as a joke. Women and men are equal we're both humans, unlike lions and cats who are totally separate species (:
Oh, so incorrect assumptions now constitute a valid argument? In that case, I guess a house fly and a horse fly are now "the same species kinda but you know what I mean". You should rewrite the entire scientific order. Things would be so much easier for simple-minded people like you to understand.
And Equal, allow me to apologize if the conversation is too smart for you. How about I bring it back to your standards? Yur dumness onley prooves Munchy's point.
Women are good at cleaning too and a lot of other things :( and there's no real need for you to say women are inferior because you know they can do things better than men sometimes..
I think the key word here is overall. Men and women are overall equal, but men can do some things better than women and women can do some things better than men.
Well, lions and cats are separate species (Panthera leo and Felis catus, respectively) but I agree with you about men and women being too different to be on the same plane, even.
And Equal, you make me want to be a misogynist. smh
Basic humor must be all you can understand because that joke was pathetic. I understand you may think you're so clever because you can classify cats and lions properly, but focus on the topic at hand. When I asked to make this easier, I meant for you.
No, your name is not a reasonable argument. I could make my name "Women<Men" and would that be a reasonable argument? No. Just another reason you're inferior.
Okay, then. Here's my opinion on the all-important debate: Women and men are not equal. There is too large a disparity between them in all aspects: physical, social, intellectual, etc. And society has already pitted the two against each other so much that it is impossible to coexist.
You certainly seem deluded enough to immediately reject my idea and continue believing in your romanticized ideals (so like a woman). So before you inevitably tell me I'm wrong, let me just say fuck you, feminazi. Have fun arguing with someone else, because I'm done with you.
No men are better at cleaning then women but it would just be a shame for a male to waste all his potential on trivial things like housework when a less-able person is available to do the work for him.
Like what? Birth a baby? The only reason they're better then men at that is because, again, if a man were to have to take off of work for a whole 9 months due to being pregnant, it would be a waste of potential. That's why women were designed by God to be able to carry a child while male's were not--just another example of evidence men are superior.
Just because you disagree with me, or my opinions are different, I'm a troll? Who says your opinion is right and mine is wrong? They're opinions, and neither is right nor wrong.
Why do we have to even compare men and women? Why do people get reduced to their gender? I feel like it's enough to say "Some people are better at some things than other people", and leave it at that. Comparing the two most general groups of the human race is not going to get us anywhere. Ever. Honestly, I don't believe any one person is superior to another.
Sigh. Men and women are different because they have typically played different roles. Yes, men are usually physically stronger, but women have a stronger immune system. Men typically have better eye sight but women have stronger senses of smell. Men are at greater risk to genetic abnormalities due to the single x chromosome they have but after menopause women are at great risk for developing osteoporosis and their cardiovascular health gets worse (by this I mean hormones before menopause make women have a lower risk then men after the risk is about even). Unfortunately ignorance is common in both sexes...
Yes, there are differences between women and men physically and mentally, but in reality we are equal. The stereotype is that men are big and strong and play sports and women just cook and clean and give birth. But just look at the womens olympic teams. Even outside of the olympics, women play sports just like men do. Men cook and clean as well. All the iron chefs are men.
Basically, I really wanted to get in this comment argument and prove a point. :)
I just gotta ask. In the string of comments at the top of the page, you (OP) mention that "men would be able to adapt and survive" if women weren't around to give birth.
Just to help you out a bit, statements like that are a part of the whole "you're a troll" theory.
How? I've been trying my very best to remain open and respectful here, while all you people have resorted to calling me a bastard, troll, and now douchebag. If I think men are superior to women, it doesn't mean I treat women bad, I simply think men are better at the majority of things. Please, feel free to tell me what I've done that was "douchey."
That post just works against you, you know. You obviously can't be tactful by appealing to both the males and females. You're being a conceited brute: You vs. the majority. If you truly were superior, as you claim, you would have acquired or discovered that appealing to men and women in your point would ultimately make you superior. But nobody can please everyone, therefore nobody is superior. Knowledge is power.
Something less offensive to say would have been "I believe the majority of men are superior to the majority of women. Just like cats can't equal dogs." still offensive, but less so.
You are a man. Without noticing your username, I could tell because of your use of biased adjectives. Therefore, though you may have worded it incorrectly, the post in question is saying that you believe you are superior to women
What? I never said I was superior, simply that it is my belief that men are superior to women. The fact that not all males agreed with the post does not in any way make them less superior.
Even if you're trolling, I feel like I have to say this:
Just because two things are different doesn't mean they're unequal. I mean, if they aren't different, they can't be equal because they would be the same thing.
its funny because female lions do all the hunting and are much more key to a pack's survival. All the male lion does is sit on his ass and protect the pack whenever an enemy comes trying to hunt lions. unless a stronger male comes along and beats the male in a fight. Female lion's role is much more important because, in all honesty, what animal in their right mind would try to hunt lions
Men are not superior to women. I hate that word. "Superior". It's such a douchey word. Yes, men's bodies are physically stronger, it's the way we're made, it's natural. Men are supposed to have a higher muscle density, women are supposed to have a higher body fat percentage. Basic biology. But to even consider that men are superior to women in all aspects is wrong. Your mother is a woman, show a little respect. The physical strength is the only thing we have that is higher than a woman has. Other than that, no. So remove yourself from your female hating pedestal, you uppity cunt.
I think this guy is a giant clever troll who has just trolled the crap out of all of you. Men and women are complementary and one cannot survive without the other. Therefore in that respect they are equal. One gender without the other would die out in time because we are not asexual and we don't split apart to reproduce like bacteria. Men have only treated women as less equal throughout history because they are naturally stronger and had to protect the women. But one cannot live without the other. This guy is either a big troll or a big troll.
We debated this all the time in my APUSH class. I think men and women can't be equal forthe same reason horses and oxen are used for diffrent kind of work (sorry, that's a really terrible example), each is just inherently better at a certain set of skills.
I think, as a man myself, that your post would make more sense, if you used a lion and a panther. One's lazy as fuck, and one will stab you in the back.
I congratulate you at a successful trolling OP. These women with smaller brains than us cannot recognize an obvious troll post followed up with troll comments, and for this I salute you!
Women can far surpass men in many areas.
Women are better at being empathetic and detecting others' emotions (in general)
.
Who is stronger matters little as without man and woman there is no child. No continuation
But that's kinda degrading, doncha think? Also, I'm against pornography as well, but again, another issue for another time.
I don't think men are superior at everything, I just think they're superior physically.
No cherry blossom, that's not how it works. Male bodies are PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR. That is because evolution decided they had to be for survival. A female black widow spider eats and kills her male partner because her body is vastly physically superior. Sure the male spide is a great design and good for it's purpose, but the females is better. It is exactly the same here except we don't eat you (out of courtesy)
Ok but my metaphor wasnt meant to be pushed that much further, and the last part was a joke. You ignored the basis, which is that much like female spiders have physically superior bodies for a purpose, male homo sapien do as well. Doesnt make boys better than girls, it means we were made bigger better faster stronger or whatever because our purpose is to be. Males are better at being stronger is like females are better at giving birth, it's a generic predisposition based on evolution
"(I'm still going to keep arguing until that guy gives up, just to let you know. Even if it lasts the whole summer>:))"
What the fuck, CherryBlossom?
Tiger argument as a female supremacy thing, but I think I'm being reasonable on that. The ONLY thing I dismissed as 'Who the hell cares' is the 1984 because I didn't see why knowing the year women started doing a marathon was relevant, but I see and 'understand' the point you wanted to get across now
I'm just so disappointed in you...
Oh wow. It's almost laughable how biased that comic is.
I think you are missing the point. Females are more likely than males to get breast cancer, you can't say 'I judge a body's superiority based on which body can get breast cancer easier.' it's your right to judge it on that, but it's wrong. The male body is built to handle more physical stress and do things that require more strength due to muscle strength and bone density. In the evolutionary 'hunter gatherer' use of the word the male body was built superior in that it was built for the ability to survive better than the female. Not to say males are better than females or that female bodies don't have a great body for their purpose. But in a life or death situation males have been PHYSICALLY better equipped to survive.
If men aren't superior, why were women held down in the first place? Clearly if they were equal it would not have happened.
This argument started to degrade after you started getting kind of 'feminazi' Ish. If you read the first few comments I was EXTREMELY tactful and understanding. I never implied women are weak. Put the average man and the average women in a cage with a tiger? You bet on the man, he has an evolutionary better chance of survival. It's as simple as that, that's the design. I also never said there are no strong women at all, your twisting my words. Also in the 18-42 category men have an average 3.8 higher IQ. I don't think it matters, and I don't think that makes it ok to boast men are smarter than women, but it's accurate. Also I don't get your marathon comment, it's pretty good she ran a marathon in 1984? A hundred years after men started doing it? Men are on average physically stronger, that has been my only point and you can't dispute it
A lot happened without me. Alright condensed final reply. If you don't judge SOLELY PHYSICAL superiority on athleticism then what do you judge it on? In my view every other physical part of our bodies is (more) specially engineered for a purpose and an argument of it would be futile. I see it as 'A mans body is physically superior' in the same way 'a woman's ability to multi task is mentally superior' both I view as true but, equality wise, irrelevant. I mentioned 100 years walker to combat your irrelevant year comment with an equally irrelevant year comment. I don't think either had point. I'm not saying men will never lose to women I'm saying they have genetic advantage not a 100 year advantage. A women could have the fastest marathon time but men could still be better at maraton than women through average. (I don't know or care I'd that's true). K the tiger thing isn't something I'm easily finding middle ground with. WITHOUT variables in the general sense it's understood a man would have better chance through, again, genetic advantage; just as easily as women have a well understood advantage to stop babies from crying. Not better just different. Haha ya I do kind of see your
Thank you, finally someone agrees with me.
I'm willing to bet that a man is fully capable of making a sandwich that is just as good if not better then a women's. But that depends, and I'm looking for an example outside of the stereotypical "cooking, cleaning, etc." type of thing.
What are women superior to men at? Just 1 example is all I'm asking for, but I bet you can't give me any.
They're better porn actors.
okay because I have a ball as my picture and I'm "not rolling away" I must be a stationary ball in real life with that logic?
... Making sandwiches?
They're also better at being whores.
You started getting yelly and dropping random acts of female athletacism, then you said women are smarter than men you just have to find the data. Thats kinda femanazi-Ish. That's not the point, let's say the tiger will only kill one, the average man has a better chance of survival. IQ level is pretty infallible. That's ok, you don't have to believe men are superior physically. I'm sure you will some day. You said that a women ran a marathon in 1984, my response was who the hell cares? Men did it 100 years earlier, who cares about that either.
A male could possibly stand a chance against a tiger, however unlikely it is, but a women stands absolutely no chance. I'm not trying to be mean, men are just naturally better physically then women.
@CherryBlossom-
"Biologically, we are equal. Yes, there are physical differences, however you cannot not say that one is superior physically."
Um... seriously? You don't honestly think women and men are equal physically, do you?
Who can live with the pain of childbirt? Not men ha ha. Men get a little cold and lay about crying for days..
But you'd take a bunch of different surveys and whichever one won the most would be "better."
So if an apple stays ripe longer, but oranges have a longer growing season and are easier to grow, they'd be considered the superior fruit.
And I'm no troll, I feel I've made rather good arguments to this point. As for the slavery post, please, allow me to quickly defend my point:
I believe in a more humane form of slavery, not the cruel type history has forced us to imagine. This type would be monitored, and you would need to have enough slaves to work in maximum shifts of 10 hours. The slaves would need to live in houses with enough bedding for all of them, along with AC and heating. But again, this isn't about slavery, I only explained that so as to maybe convince you to take me seriously.
I'm not a troll. Please, if you have a good argument for me, I'd love to hear it.
Yes, if you were to take into account how long each stays ripe, how easy it is to grow them, what conditions they survive in etc.
I'm sorry, my name in no way is meant to imply anything about women being inferior--I'm just not good at making usernames and this had a nice ring to it.
And I'm not so much for slavery, I'm just saying that in the long run, if it benefits society, should it not be allowed? But this isn't a debate on slavery, so I'm not getting into that.
How does the username "MunchyMan" imply I'm a troll in any way?
But if 2 things are different, then logically, one must be better. It is impossible for 2 different things to be completely equal.
Um women are definitely equal to men. It says so in my name (:
@MunchyMan, as much as it pains me to admit it, your argument held its own at the beginning.
@Equal, you were arguing in favor of equality right? Because you could have fooled me.
So at first I thought I was reading a conversation between two idiots. Then I thought I was reading a conversation between a troll and an idiot. Then some people with brains jumped in and I kinda lost track. The only thing that really stuck is that Equal is an idiot.
well I wasn't using it as an argument just as a joke. Women and men are equal we're both humans, unlike lions and cats who are totally separate species (:
Yeah but you call a cat a cat and a lion a lion. They're different things :) but you call a man a human and a woman a human because we're equal
What the hell is wrong with all you people?
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't think you're more incorrect. Equal just didn't have many, if any at all, good points.
Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species. That's the phylogenic order. You did not say they were the same family, you said species.
...
Wow, I guess my standards for you were too high. At least I can understand basic humor!
No men need women to give birth or else humans would die out.
Oh, so incorrect assumptions now constitute a valid argument? In that case, I guess a house fly and a horse fly are now "the same species kinda but you know what I mean". You should rewrite the entire scientific order. Things would be so much easier for simple-minded people like you to understand.
And Equal, allow me to apologize if the conversation is too smart for you. How about I bring it back to your standards? Yur dumness onley prooves Munchy's point.
Women are good at cleaning too and a lot of other things :( and there's no real need for you to say women are inferior because you know they can do things better than men sometimes..
I think the key word here is overall. Men and women are overall equal, but men can do some things better than women and women can do some things better than men.
Idk why we went from the original point to discussing cats and lions instead. Can you try to focus so we can just have an easier debate or whatever?
Well, lions and cats are separate species (Panthera leo and Felis catus, respectively) but I agree with you about men and women being too different to be on the same plane, even.
And Equal, you make me want to be a misogynist. smh
Thank you!
Sorry, that's my bad, though I'm sure most people knew that cats and lions are not the same species and could probably interpret what I meant.
My dumbness? Or should I say dumness. At least I can spell basic words!
Basic humor must be all you can understand because that joke was pathetic. I understand you may think you're so clever because you can classify cats and lions properly, but focus on the topic at hand. When I asked to make this easier, I meant for you.
No you call a man a man and a woman a woman. Because we are different. And one is just better then the other. And guess which is superior? The man.
But cats and lions are both a part of one more general species, the Felidae family.
No, your name is not a reasonable argument. I could make my name "Women<Men" and would that be a reasonable argument? No. Just another reason you're inferior.
Okay, then. Here's my opinion on the all-important debate: Women and men are not equal. There is too large a disparity between them in all aspects: physical, social, intellectual, etc. And society has already pitted the two against each other so much that it is impossible to coexist.
You certainly seem deluded enough to immediately reject my idea and continue believing in your romanticized ideals (so like a woman). So before you inevitably tell me I'm wrong, let me just say fuck you, feminazi. Have fun arguing with someone else, because I'm done with you.
No men would be able to adapt and survive.
No men are better at cleaning then women but it would just be a shame for a male to waste all his potential on trivial things like housework when a less-able person is available to do the work for him.
Like what? Birth a baby? The only reason they're better then men at that is because, again, if a man were to have to take off of work for a whole 9 months due to being pregnant, it would be a waste of potential. That's why women were designed by God to be able to carry a child while male's were not--just another example of evidence men are superior.
Lions and cats are the same species dumbshit. One is just superior, and the other inferior. Just like humans.
Well women are better at some things like cleaning, while men are better and stupid things like sports and driving. It balances out
You're all idiots for feeding the troll.
After reading all of this....I cannot take you seriously.
You havent even made any arguments to support your post. You're just defending yourself..
No matter how many times you say it, no one will believe you until you get some sense knocked into you.
Goodness! Just shut up already.
Just because you disagree with me, or my opinions are different, I'm a troll? Who says your opinion is right and mine is wrong? They're opinions, and neither is right nor wrong.
I have:
One debate started here: http://amirite.net/727771/1753592
Another here: http://amirite.net/727771/1753659
And there's more.
How many times do I have to say that I'm not a troll?
Why should I shut up? Why not everyone else getting into a debate on this post? I'm tired of being called a troll because people disagree, damnit!
Why do we have to even compare men and women? Why do people get reduced to their gender? I feel like it's enough to say "Some people are better at some things than other people", and leave it at that. Comparing the two most general groups of the human race is not going to get us anywhere. Ever. Honestly, I don't believe any one person is superior to another.
Sigh. Men and women are different because they have typically played different roles. Yes, men are usually physically stronger, but women have a stronger immune system. Men typically have better eye sight but women have stronger senses of smell. Men are at greater risk to genetic abnormalities due to the single x chromosome they have but after menopause women are at great risk for developing osteoporosis and their cardiovascular health gets worse (by this I mean hormones before menopause make women have a lower risk then men after the risk is about even). Unfortunately ignorance is common in both sexes...
I adore women ( the idea of them anyway ). Just the way I'm wired. But collectively, men without a doubt make better music.
X TO THE MUTHA FUCKN Y!
(but yeah were basically equal, yaddah yaddah. This conversation happens almost monthly on amirite)
A woman gave birth to you. You have no right to disrespect them.
Um she still gave birth to you its just that you wernt made natrally
I was a test tube baby.
Yes, there are differences between women and men physically and mentally, but in reality we are equal. The stereotype is that men are big and strong and play sports and women just cook and clean and give birth. But just look at the womens olympic teams. Even outside of the olympics, women play sports just like men do. Men cook and clean as well. All the iron chefs are men.
Basically, I really wanted to get in this comment argument and prove a point. :)
Yes, but any women's Olympics team would be crushed by any male's Olympics team.
Why is this negative? I dare you to put the WNBA players up against regular NBA players and see who wins.
I just gotta ask. In the string of comments at the top of the page, you (OP) mention that "men would be able to adapt and survive" if women weren't around to give birth.
Just to help you out a bit, statements like that are a part of the whole "you're a troll" theory.
If people like this exist that are such ignorant, bastard-pricks, and they AREN'T a troll, the I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
You think women are inferior? Seriously what girl would marry someone that says that. That's like the most piggish thing you could say...
You sir, are a douche bag. :D
I haven't been a bastard or a prick, I've been much more respectful then any of the other commenters, yourself included.
How? I've been trying my very best to remain open and respectful here, while all you people have resorted to calling me a bastard, troll, and now douchebag. If I think men are superior to women, it doesn't mean I treat women bad, I simply think men are better at the majority of things. Please, feel free to tell me what I've done that was "douchey."
That post just works against you, you know. You obviously can't be tactful by appealing to both the males and females. You're being a conceited brute: You vs. the majority. If you truly were superior, as you claim, you would have acquired or discovered that appealing to men and women in your point would ultimately make you superior. But nobody can please everyone, therefore nobody is superior. Knowledge is power.
Something less offensive to say would have been "I believe the majority of men are superior to the majority of women. Just like cats can't equal dogs." still offensive, but less so.
You are a man. Without noticing your username, I could tell because of your use of biased adjectives. Therefore, though you may have worded it incorrectly, the post in question is saying that you believe you are superior to women
Im glad you could understand my point. ~a thirteen year old girl.
You're welcome. Like i said, knowledge is power.
I'm glad you listened to me without just calling me a bastard, douche, or troll, even though you disagreed with me. Thank you for being respectful.
Yes, maybe that would have been a better way to word it. Ah well, too late now.
What? I never said I was superior, simply that it is my belief that men are superior to women. The fact that not all males agreed with the post does not in any way make them less superior.
Even if you're trolling, I feel like I have to say this:
Just because two things are different doesn't mean they're unequal. I mean, if they aren't different, they can't be equal because they would be the same thing.
Hey OP- just out of curiosity, are you racist?
its funny because female lions do all the hunting and are much more key to a pack's survival. All the male lion does is sit on his ass and protect the pack whenever an enemy comes trying to hunt lions. unless a stronger male comes along and beats the male in a fight. Female lion's role is much more important because, in all honesty, what animal in their right mind would try to hunt lions
Men are not superior to women. I hate that word. "Superior". It's such a douchey word. Yes, men's bodies are physically stronger, it's the way we're made, it's natural. Men are supposed to have a higher muscle density, women are supposed to have a higher body fat percentage. Basic biology. But to even consider that men are superior to women in all aspects is wrong. Your mother is a woman, show a little respect. The physical strength is the only thing we have that is higher than a woman has. Other than that, no. So remove yourself from your female hating pedestal, you uppity cunt.
I think this guy is a giant clever troll who has just trolled the crap out of all of you. Men and women are complementary and one cannot survive without the other. Therefore in that respect they are equal. One gender without the other would die out in time because we are not asexual and we don't split apart to reproduce like bacteria. Men have only treated women as less equal throughout history because they are naturally stronger and had to protect the women. But one cannot live without the other. This guy is either a big troll or a big troll.
I just really like dill pickles. I could eat a whole jar tbh
We debated this all the time in my APUSH class. I think men and women can't be equal forthe same reason horses and oxen are used for diffrent kind of work (sorry, that's a really terrible example), each is just inherently better at a certain set of skills.
I think, as a man myself, that your post would make more sense, if you used a lion and a panther. One's lazy as fuck, and one will stab you in the back.
Transvestites are superior to men
I congratulate you at a successful trolling OP. These women with smaller brains than us cannot recognize an obvious troll post followed up with troll comments, and for this I salute you!
TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL