This just seems so misinformed and naive that I'm tempted to dub thee a troll

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Already found this out, "bro"

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I know I commented again below, didn't you see? lol. bro. you voted it down. bro.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Bro alright take a chill pill

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Bros bros bros bros bros bros wheres the bromance theres to much brohate goin on here

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Farewell, thy royal articulateness (psst. there never was a "discussion":/... )

by Anonymous 12 years ago

guys guys! this is what the gun nuts WANT! Don't we all agree that the logic of this post is basically retarded? Of course you can't compare guns and cars in this way. I'm totally sacrificing my average post score in order to get my view across here, haha. I've been voted down on every single post. It's gonna take some mega gay rights and big laugh comments to get my average back! Let's join against these crazies!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

We really need to get a sarcasm font for the Internet. It would make conversations so much more understandable.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I think an outrageous statement like, "we should ban cars..." is pretty easy to interpret as sarcasm.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

i mean for the subtler occasions.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

@stickcaveman - on reflection you're probably right...but seriously have you read some of the non-sarcastic rubbish that's on here? hahaha you can't be totally sure sometimes.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

yeah, i clicked no way, not because I don't want to save lives, but because the post is just...nonsensical

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That's the fucking point. It's gun control logic.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

you mean you're being ironic?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Wouldn't say ironic, but yeah.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Ooooohh I was worried for a few seconds thar

by Anonymous 12 years ago

So...you're saying that...this kind of logic is stupid, right?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Yeah, and yet it supposedly makes sense to most people here.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

well, you don't seem to make it clear and honestly i just read it and thought you meant it

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I take it means you DON'T believe in gun control? Even handguns and other non-hunting related ones?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

you can hunt with handguns

by Anonymous 12 years ago

yeah but they're not classified as hunting weapons, right? That's an important factor. Obviously you can hunt with any gun, or any projectile weapon for that matter. Whatever, gun control is very important

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Actually you cant hunt with every gun because of gun control

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Oh my gosh. We get the point. You're pro-guns or whatever. The last 3 posts I've read by you have been related to guns in some way. Please, post about a new topic.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It's a little weird that you're keeping track of what I post o_0

by Anonymous 12 years ago

It's not really keeping track if they're all on the just in page. I noticed a pattern, looked back at the name of the poster, and lo and behold! They were all by you.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Sounds like you got a pretty pathetic life if you care that BB is making gun posts.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Harsh dude - sounded more to me like he was just offering a banter-like pointer, along the vein of "put on a different record" - people have said that to me before. Who cares?

by Anonymous 12 years ago

He can post whatever he wants, Anon. Gun control is a pretty hot topic right now.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Oho! You and your anti gun control analogies! I like the post and i like your view

by Anonymous 12 years ago

That would totally ruin my dream to drive in one and a half years.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

Please be troll

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I don't think guns should be banned, but the regulation system we have is not strict enough. I mean seriously, getting 6000 rounds of ammunition through the internet? That's ridiculous!

by Anonymous 12 years ago

He also ordered them in a very short amount of time.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

No gun owner needs 6000 rounds at once. That should have raised a red flag.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

no one needs it but some people just like to buy in bulk. shit if I had the money I would buy 6000 rounds of ammunition at once, just means I don't have to buy anymore for a while. there isn't really any difference from buying 6000 and 100. he could have caused just as much damage picking up a 100rd value pack at walmart. you want to stop mass shootings from happening then just don't interfere with law abiding citizens carrying firearms to protect themselves.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I wonder how many people No wayed this post because they disagreed about what it said about gun rights and how many because they didn't understand it was a metaphor.

by Anonymous 12 years ago

I know I'm a bit late, but what kind of civilian actually NEEDS a gun? I live in Australia where there are very strict regulations on guns (E.g. You need a license, you need them stored in a safe at home, Ammunition needs to be stored in a separate safe and all this is just for sporting/farming reasons.) If they were made illegal, sure people would still get them illegally, but it saves people who don't actually NEED a gun having them. Here we have very little problems to do with guns, and when they're involved, there's often harsh consequences. I also must admit, I don't know much about the American Constitution and what it entails, but seriously, who put 'The right to bare arms' there? What kind of paranoid person did that? With a couple of good locks, you could probably get the same protection. Just as a normal citizen, I can tell you through observations, that where strict guns laws lack, more violent attacks occur, you can't deny it... It's a shame really.

by Anonymous 12 years ago