The voters have decided that NerdyBlonde is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also about Countries & Places
-59It would be funny if China invades US to STOP a communist takeover, amirite?
Also about fox news
+55Martha MacCallum's days as a Fox News blonde are surely coming to an end. Amirite? More Also about government, fox news, and advantage
+113Not all conservatives are close-minded, fox news crazed, jack asses with no respect for women or minorities, and not all liberals are young stoners who want to take advantage of the government. Each side believes anyone on the other side is as crazy as the extremists; however, if they took the time to listen, they could compromise on a few issues and actually get some work done, amirite?
Also about population and small percentage
+167Cramming students into a gymnasium (without any advanced warning) and giving a small percentage pizza and the rest rice (showing percentages of people with access to good food versus people who don't, on a global scale) and forcing them to watch videos of young children crying over their parents' deaths is the WRONG way to convey the message of world hunger to a student population. Amirite?
Punished? How so?
And while it sounded insensitive and narrow-minded, Romney was absolutely right when he talked about the 47%. The bottom 47% of earners in America pay -2% of the nation's taxes.
And if you look at the vote split by demographics, most of Obama's votes came from minorities and low earners...most likely because they know they'll get more government benefits with this president
Not necessarily more government benefits as in welfare, but more support for the average people, the 80% of Americans who together own ~10% of the nation's wealth. These people want regulations and support because they don't want to get screwed over. Thus, they prefer harsher treatment to the upper class. Then again, the rich people are the same, so they prefer harsher treatment to the lower class. People don't vote Obama so they can get welfare. Only 4% of the population is on welfare. They vote because they think he cares more about the conditions of the working class.
Government benefits don't just include welfare. They include all manner of social programs, laws and regulations, and policies that benefit those people at taxpayer expense. And if you look at the vote, you'll see that if the people that do exploit these benefits didn't vote, we would have a different president right now.
People say that Romney tried to outspend Obama to win the election but he did the same thing. The difference is he used our money to buy our vote instead of his own
You use roads? Benefit from the police? Go to public school? Are protected by the army? Yeah, pretty much everyone is. If people who didn't do any of those things voted, we wouldn't have a president at all because those people don't exist.
First off, the government doesn't need to be involved in some of those, but simply opt to so they have more power over the people such as school.
And there is a difference between using government-provided services and exploiting social programs and handouts (as per the 47%).
My point here is that government buys votes through handouts. Whether they are necessary I'd a different question as is who uses them. The fact never changes: government buys the people
So what? Romney thinks they are low lifes that do nothing for society and feel entitled to these benefits. Most of them work extremely hard to provide for their family. The only people who feel entitled to anything are people in the 1% like Romney.
Really? You're one of those people that hate successful people? How does it make them entitled when they pay for everything they have AND everything that 47% has?
To be fair, Winnie, they also earn around 0.3% of the nations income
According to IRS reports from 2009, they have 13% of it
The bottom 80% does, yes
http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesam...er/wealth.html
For the first figure (the 0.3% of wealth), go to the section titled "Do Americans know their country's wealth distribution?"
Not all of his voters were, but a lot of them. And Romney actually worked to get to where he is.