+81 If Bigfoot were real, it would have been captured and locked in a zoo years ago, amirite?

by Anonymous 10 years ago

or maybe sasquatch is a really good Waldo

by Anonymous 10 years ago

My brother is secretly Bigfoot, don't tell anyone.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I don't think that Bigfoot the creature, as characterized by the mainstream beliefs, exists. But do you really think that we've or even are able to see, much less capture, any organism? Hell, there are organisms which haven't even been discovered, classified, named yet, I'm sure. That doesn't mean that they're not out there, as ridiculous as they may be, though.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I think there are countless entities that we don't know about both big and small. I think a lot of them are deep, deep down in the waters though.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

But who is to say that one doesn't exist on land without having examined everywhere that said organism could be?

by Anonymous 10 years ago

There's a lot of unexplored territory so I allow for that possibility. I'd even say it's guaranteed. Plus, there might be some organisms our senses don't pick up on. Who knows?

by Anonymous 10 years ago

So if such an organism does exist, and we haven't discovered it yet, how exactly would we capture it?

by Anonymous 10 years ago

We'd probably have to invent something that makes up for what our senses lack. For example, we invented the microscope.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

You just said it's guaranteed that undiscovered organisms do exist. That //could// mean Bigfoot or a Bigfoot-like creature, yes? But the post said that if such an organism were to exist, we would have already found, caught, and displayed it; we haven't done this, though; therefore, this organism does not exist. Which directly contradicts what you said about unknown organisms.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Oh, that is true. Still, I agree with the post. When talking about Big Foot in context, people have reportedly seen Big Foot, but have never captured it. You would think they would do a better job of providing evidence.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

You would think

by Anonymous 10 years ago

wary

by Anonymous 10 years ago

The unknown stuff that hides in deep water used to keep me up at night.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I feel you Hello Kitty especially since those organisms look completely different than the ones we're used to seeing

by Anonymous 10 years ago

With all the technology we have, I don't understand how we cannot capture something that so many people have supposedly witnessed. Much less, I'm disappointed that the only "evidence" found is some footprints and blurry photos. Bigfoot hunting shows are just like ghost hunting shows. Some "experts" walk around with night vision cameras then they play some spooky noises in the background but never really capture any hard evidence. But to be honest, the post isn't so much about Bigfoot's existence as it is humanity being all "Look! An odd species! Let's capture it and put it on display for all to see!"

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Yeah but we obviously haven't done that yet. That doesn't mean that such a creature doesn't exist though. Also, there is other "evidence" such as hair, blood, mucus, toenail, bark scrapings, saliva, and skin which has been found. I'll link the article below http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/bigfoot-existence-backed-dna-video-report-article-1.1473883

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I'm still not quite buying it.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I'll be the first to admit that there aren't many (any?) reliable sources on the matter.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

Gorillas are bigfooted enough

by Anonymous 10 years ago

big foot was a sham, the guy who fabricated the whole thing died in the early 2000s.

by Anonymous 10 years ago

I didn't say it was real.

by Anonymous 10 years ago