They most certainly //do//  apply, in the case of female circumcisions.   It's just not politically correct to mention where these are most often practiced.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Yes laws protecting babies from permanent damage from their parents and the children themselves seems reasonable

by Anonymous 4 years ago

on the female side ..I have no understanding of, but talking about it is the right direction

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Suffice it to say, it is //horrible, barbaric,//  compared to what is usually done in male circumcisions, which themselves are bad enough.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIQTlvvd5CY

by Anonymous 4 years ago

the way it's done is the barbaric part, rusty blades in a street ally sometimes … many people are embarrassed with their genitals and should surely fix it how they see fit .. but to force it on a baby lacks a little compassion...babies can never truly consent

by Anonymous 4 years ago

These female circumcisions are assuredly //not//  for cosmetic purposes, except possibly for disfigurement.   And I doubt that many grown women would voluntarily opt for a clitoridectomy.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

The only thing I have an opinion about is. I like a clean one, the foreskin always seems nasty, like the skin on a clam neck. In usa most men and all jewish men have a good clean shaft.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

I love hearing your opinion … but I hope it's done for the mans comfort

by Anonymous 4 years ago

When my man is clean, I make sure he is very comfortable

by Anonymous 4 years ago

If the woman/women in question support abolishment of male circumcision, you might not want to count their opinions out.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

no.. I still think they don't matter … but at least you tried. the other replies are very selfish

by Anonymous 4 years ago