we should preserve and permit large areas of land for human habitat protection the same way we do for animals, amirite?
you know... for humans who don't own land
The voters have decided that unknowncondition is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also by unknowncondition
+79I've wasted many hours arguing this with people, this must finally be settled, amirite? More
Also about human, animals, and habitat
+161Australia is the worst habitat to live in if you're human, because 90% of the animals there are trying to kill you. amirite?
Isn’t that just what towns and cities are?
i would want undeveloped land protected for humans... why do humans think they have the right to build on nature... this land will have no electricity leaving humans to be free to live in the natural state where they have thrived for so long
Seems to me, that we already sort of have those. Even those large areas of land that are supposedly wildlife "refuges" have humans tramping around in them. Even those are being opened up to more human intrusion...like being able to "hunt" and kill animals supposedly "protected" there, for one instance.
unless we stop all the animals from hunting and surviving in those refuges, humans should be no different... there really is enough in nature to provide for all, what nature doesn't provide for is mass harvest by industry.
I feel all hunting and fishing restrictions are to support the industry more then the individual fisherman who fish for survival, not profit.... by that I mean if I eat as many illegal fished fish until my belly is full I could never do as much damage as one commercial fishing boat trying to make the most profit.
I do agree, that you could almost surely never do as much damage as one commercial fishing boat does.