The voters have decided that this post is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Also about opinion+133You hate it when you make an awesome / sexy-ass opinion here but it's so good that whoever reads it gets blinded by it's sheer sexiness alone, thus not being able to vote on it, and on top of that the opinion never ends up getting it's dream of being home paged or being post of the day; it's a pretty sad thing to think about, amirite?
Also about media and opinion-59The first amendment protects employees from offering a personal opinion on social media contrary to the opinion of big business. While leftists cheer the censoring of conservatives, they quite haven’t realized it’s about to come for them also, amirite?
Also about political opinion+353Women that have 'Obama is so sexy' as their political opinion shouldn't be allowed to vote. amirite?
Also about Politics-9The President of the United States is not physically capable of holding a press conference, amirite?
Also about star+84STAR ( California standireized test) test wont make you a star, amirite?
Also about political opinion+14Let's eliminate any leftist views. Freedom of political opinion is bad. amirite?
Also about Politics+12Why do leftys continue to bring up Marjorie Taylor Green. She is just talk, unlike Democrats who have done corrupt things. Whereas the republican party has been a saint, worthy of heavan. No republican official has EVER done ANYTHING wrong. And if anyone says otherwise, it is FAKE NEWS. amirite?
Also about political opinion+155It's interesting how one occurrence can drastically sway someone's political opinion, amirite?
Also about political opinion+239Regardless of your individual political opinion of candidates, it's stupid when the top reason to vote for a candidate like Mitt Romney is because he can "...keep his eye on the prize - the White House..." You shouldn't vote for someone because they CAN get to the White House, you should vote for them because of what they plan on doing when they get there. amirite?
Also about Politics+14This century, there have been more than enough mass shootings for Congress to finally ban assault weapons. After all, people don't need weapons that fire rapidly just to fire back at a would-be killer. We don't need rapid-firing assault weapons in our community. And banning assault weapons won't defy the second amendment, since it would only limit their rights based on types of guns. Ordinary handguns/rifles/shotguns are enough, but rapid-firing weapons only benefit serial killers, amirite?