The voters have decided that Tylercraven87 is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Also about intelligent design+124Creationists don't seem to understand that a scientific hypothesis can only be proved right by proving it null hypothesis wrong. And, since evolution and intelligent design are not even close to being null hypotheses of each other, pointing out flaws in evolution does not strengthen intelligent design, amirite?
Also about Science+83There are probably humans out there that are bigger than gorillas, amirite?
Also about intelligent design+237Intelligent design and evolution can coexist, amirite?
Also about Science+94Relativity is in the eye of the beholder. amirite?
Also about intelligent+54Most fear of super-intelligent AI revolves around a "super-intelligent" program misunderstanding a command or request, which is not very intelligent of it. amirite?
Also by Tylercraven87+64Religion was a first attempt at philosophy we don’t need it anymore, amirite?
Also about science and intelligent design-95You wouldn't want your kid's science teacher to believe in intelligent design, amirite?
Also about Science+110In hindsight it wasn't all the successful organ transplants that mark Dr. Frankenstein's accomplishment so much as figuring out a way to do it without tissue rejection and related drugs that typically make organ transplant such a monstrous experience. amirite?
Also about intelligent design+157Schools shouldn't teach evolution like it's fact. If they are teaching evolution then they should also teach creationism and intelligent design. That way it's fair. Amirite?
Also about intelligent design+151Even if you believe that Darwinian evolution is true, it is wrong to deny tenure to someone becuase they have considered intelligent design as a possibility, amirite?