People who are easily offended are twats.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Counterpoint: people going out of their way to offend people are assholes.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

True, and people seeking to offended are twats too.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Seeking to be offended? That sounds distinctly different than "easily offended".

by Anonymous 4 years ago

You have a keen mind for semantics

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Just following the conversation.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Name one time in history where the people trying to censor speech were the good guys

by Anonymous 4 years ago

See also, you don't have to be tolerant of someone else's intolerance.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Reminder to sort by controversial

by Anonymous 4 years ago

They're not offended by not being allowed to offend people, they're frustrated that many people take offense to things to which people didn't previously take offense.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

What if people did take offense, but kept quiet because it was socially unacceptable to be offended by it, and saying anything would vastly worsen the offense, possibly leading to death?

by Anonymous 4 years ago

I think that may be true in some cases, less so in others.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Everyone, since the discovery the universe is depersonal, and no one, since the multiverse is auxiliary anyways, in the isometric. A morphological distortion as big as their ego, and as little as obsession.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Well, doh!

by Anonymous 4 years ago

There are only two genders

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Sexes*

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Get that politically driven pseudoscience out of here

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Huh?

by Anonymous 4 years ago

There are boys, and there are girls.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Yea, those are sexes bro. There are two sexes, and the occasional hermaphrodite. Just clarifying the distinction between sex and gender.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

And I told you take that pseudoscientific nonsense elsewhere. Bro.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Call it whatever you want, but what I'm saying is the general consensus of almost all gender studies scholers. If you don't trust actual scholars that's fine, but to use the term pseudoscience is holistically incorrect. Just because you don't understand (or reject) the concept of gender dosent mean it's pseudo anything, it just reflects your inability to differentiate biological sex and the social constructs we expect from the different sexes. To say there are two genders is observably incorrect, as we can observe individuals who do not fit into a binary female or male gender type. We can observe androgynous individuals who blur the line between male and female and can't truly be placed in a binary female or male gender archetype. You seem to be quite agitated about this, which I find very odd. And your persistence to write off the concept of gender as politically motived is quite strange as well as it really has nothing to do with politics in the slightest.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Your confidence in your ignorance is hilarious.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

But there are :)

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Yup. Because god forbid we don't act like asses towards other people for no reason.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

Hi. I am one of those people. That is all.

by Anonymous 4 years ago

We call those *snowflakes*

by Anonymous 4 years ago