The voters have decided that itsskyway is right!
Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Related Posts
Also about Money & Economics
-141This once was a great site with lot's of people to talk too. Seems kind of distant now. Amirite?? amirite?
Also about Money & Economics
-140Don't suppose you people who just downvote me could explain why? Or do you have no guts? amirite?
Name one time in history where the people trying to censor speech were the good guys
Reminder to sort by controversial
See also, you don't have to be tolerant of someone else's intolerance.
People who are easily offended are twats.
Counterpoint: people going out of their way to offend people are assholes.
True, and people seeking to offended are twats too.
Seeking to be offended? That sounds distinctly different than "easily offended".
You have a keen mind for semantics
Just following the conversation.
Everyone, since the discovery the universe is depersonal, and no one, since the multiverse is auxiliary anyways, in the isometric.
A morphological distortion as big as their ego, and as little as obsession.
Well, doh!
There are only two genders
But there are :)
Sexes*
Get that politically driven pseudoscience out of here
Huh?
There are boys, and there are girls.
Yea, those are sexes bro.
There are two sexes, and the occasional hermaphrodite.
Just clarifying the distinction between sex and gender.
And I told you take that pseudoscientific nonsense elsewhere.
Bro.
Your confidence in your ignorance is hilarious.
Call it whatever you want, but what I'm saying is the general consensus of almost all gender studies scholers. If you don't trust actual scholars that's fine, but to use the term pseudoscience is holistically incorrect.
Just because you don't understand (or reject) the concept of gender dosent mean it's pseudo anything, it just reflects your inability to differentiate biological sex and the social constructs we expect from the different sexes.
To say there are two genders is observably incorrect, as we can observe individuals who do not fit into a binary female or male gender type. We can observe androgynous individuals who blur the line between male and female and can't truly be placed in a binary female or male gender archetype.
You seem to be quite agitated about this, which I find very odd. And your persistence to write off the concept of gender as politically motived is quite strange as well as it really has nothing to do with politics in the slightest.
Yup. Because god forbid we don't act like asses towards other people for no reason.
Hi. I am one of those people. That is all.
We call those snowflakes
They're not offended by not being allowed to offend people, they're frustrated that many people take offense to things to which people didn't previously take offense.
What if people did take offense, but kept quiet because it was socially unacceptable to be offended by it, and saying anything would vastly worsen the offense, possibly leading to death?
I think that may be true in some cases, less so in others.