+96

If a person that doesn't identify as a male nor a female becomes a monarch, they probably wouldn't use the terms king nor queen, so they would invent another word. amirite?

99%Yeah You Are1%No Way
fragsworths avatar History
Share
0 15
The voters have decided that fragsworth is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.

Or they'd just be called monarch like you just said lol

Quing

swiggybabys avatar swiggybaby Yeah You Are +5Reply
@swiggybaby Quing

Came here to say it but also it sounds like something a cute toddler would say lol

motorbikemillys avatar motorbikemilly Yeah You Are +5Reply

Honorable eunuch??

Openeyess avatar Openeyes Yeah You Are +5Reply

I recommend "Radish "

This is where the surfers come in, dude

Achilles982s avatar Achilles982 Yeah You Are +5Reply

If a member of a Royal Family didn't identify with either male or female, they would be disowned, or at least, wouldn't be in line for the throne.

Royal families are far too conservative and old fashioned for things like not identifying as male or female.

@Dairyqueenemployee If a member of a Royal Family didn't identify with either male or female, they would be disowned, or at least...

Nowdays you're probably right for all the monarchies in the world, but in the future (if monarchies still exist) this might be a possibility. I'm not saying is likely, but it's not impossible

I'm think that it would have to be a completely different word because if you combine king and queen that would probably work more for a gender fluid person so maybe they would just be referred to as your majesty

Grand Poobah.

No, they would use Queen no matter what.

They could be Keen or Quing

Please   login   or signup   to leave a comment.