The voters have decided that 88080808088 is right! Vote on the post to say if you agree or disagree.
Also by 88080808088+119Optimism is incredibly oppressive. amirite?
Also about Art+120Venn chose like the most inconvenient shape for a diagram. amirite?
Also by 88080808088+122If all measuring scales shrink No one will know and We'll all assume everything else got bigger. amirite?
Also about Art+46Given with how good he is with misdirection, Agent 47 would make for a fantastic magician, amirite?
Also about Art+112Tattoo artists who specialize on swastikas just weren't very artistic to begin with. amirite?
Also by 88080808088+155Beards to men have become what make up is to women. amirite?
Norman Rockwell would disagree.
However, even during his day, he was not respected as a painter. He was deemed an "illustrator" for two reasons. One, he painted for a magazine cover. Which was deemed a low art. And two, the reference for his paintings were photographs, unlike the master painters of yesteryear.
Still, Eockwell's ability to capture the finite detail of a boy's face, the comedic smile of a girl with a black eye, the infamous scene of a Thanksgiving dinner, are transfixed in our memories as classics.
I don't see how photo-realism cannot produce some amazing art in its own right today.
For me it's if I've seen this art style 500000 times(furry art) already Or if the art style is too abstract to the point where it isn't cool or beautiful or cute or realistic enough to grab my interest. Than when I see it I'm like. Next!