Incorrect. If he came inside the chicken the chicken already exists now don't it

by Anonymous 2 years ago

If the rooster is ANYTHING like me, he jerked-off & came many, many, many, many, many, many, many times before he ever banged his first chick

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Fail

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Egg came before roosters and chickens existed. The egg also came first as it hatched the slightly evolved versions of the current roosters and chickens Also not even close to being original here.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Where did the rooster come from

by Anonymous 2 years ago

He came from the hen house after banging all those chickens

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Whatever layed the first chicken egg wasn't a chicken, so no rooster would be around to impregnate it

by Anonymous 2 years ago

I think you're misunderstanding how evolution works, and I just want to make sure you understand that's not how evolution works.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

I'm well aware of how evolution works. If you were to look back in the history of the planet and find the first thing that could be identified as a chicken, whatever made that couldn't have been identified as a chicken- because it's child is the first thing to be identified as a chicken. The gradual changes would take thousands, maybe millions of years.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

No, you are demonstrating that you don't. Spanish is based on Latin, when did a Latin speaking woman give birth to the first Spanish speaking child? At no point did something that wasn't a chicken lay a chicken egg. The change is so gradual that there is no discernable difference between two generations that couldn't be chalked up to individual characteristics. It's the "missing link" argument all over again.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Existential syntax error. Try again.

by Anonymous 2 years ago