+172
Polyrhythms are the most overrated music theory concept. amirite?
by Anonymous1 year ago
Listen to Tool
by Anonymous1 year ago
I love Tool, but Tool also totally proves his point about the music not being nearly as complex as they make it sound.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Why is everyone talking about Tool?
They use them, but it's not a King Crimson and polymeters situation.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Sure, throw in Gamelan tuning, just C (non tempered) and "microtones" while you're at it.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Found the King Gizzard fan!
by Anonymous1 year ago
"Things I'm not capable of are overrated."
by Anonymous1 year ago
Someone needs to start listening to Tool.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Can't forget meshuggah
by Anonymous1 year ago
Tool fans disagree brother
by Anonymous1 year ago
I'll just take your word on it...
by Anonymous1 year ago
This seems WAY too niche for it to either be an unpopular or popular opinion. An unpopular opinion needs to be more accesible to most people than this.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Ever listened to Tool?
by Anonymous1 year ago
Yes.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Watch Tomas Haake from Meshuggah perform "Bleed"
by Anonymous1 year ago
Polymeter not polyrhythm.
by Anonymous1 year ago
polyriddim
by Anonymous1 year ago
not that song đź’€
by Anonymous1 year ago
Yes that exact song. The masterpiece of this century.
by Anonymous1 year ago
That song is about nested tuplets, the polyrhythm is just the result.
by Anonymous1 year ago
polyriddim
by Anonymous1 year ago
smoke on the water doesn't have smoke nor water.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Is fioana apples "hot knife" an example of this? What are examples?
by Anonymous1 year ago
I absolutely love hearing about drama in niche disciplines.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Based.
by Anonymous1 year ago
OP needs some Car Bomb in his life right about now me thinks…
by Anonymous1 year ago
I'm a professional drummer and educator and could not agree more. They do sound cool given the right context, but generally there are better things to focus time and energy on.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Pass the goddamn butter
by Anonymous1 year ago
So I'm going to assume that polyrhythms are something that you have been over exposed to. Which is understandable. There are a lot of people who have been exposed to music theory relatively recently thanks to the internet, and are now coming across techniques that seem novel. Polyrhythms being one example. They're easy to understand, trivial to implement digitally, and sound exotic. And so people experiment, which rarely creates something compelling, though that's besides the point. It's more that they are one more in a line of techniques to expand someone's musical vocabulary.
If a composition was rhythmically exclusively a polyrhythm (e.g. an unvarying 4:5), then i would agree that it is necessarily not very complex. But of course an uninspired use of polyrhythms is uninspired - that's a tautology. However, it would be (necessarily) more complex than 4/4 or 4/5 in isolation. One could easily make the same argument that odd time signatures or tuplets are more overrated, as they are more common, and an entire piece composed purely of one of these techniques would be similarly "monotonous". Most of your points seem to be arguments against a lack of imagination in realising a technique, rather than an argument against the technique itself.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Bold statement to make, when you only know about western music.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Bold statement to make, when you assume things.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Polyrhythm is a main component of Latin-caribean music ( like salsa) and African music.
by Anonymous1 year ago
As a music geek, I appreciate this lol
by Anonymous1 year ago
Imo, it's fugues. I love fugues, I wish there were more of them. But the way some people speak about and over analyze them is atrocious
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago