+121
Avatar 2 should be considered an animated film, amirite?
by Anonymous2 years ago
Same with the "live action" lion king remake
by Anonymous2 years ago
I think it often is. I've heard it called the highest grossing animated film ever.
I think of it as a live-action styled animated film.
by Anonymous2 years ago
On wikipedia it is actually called "photo realistic computer animated remake"
by Anonymous2 years ago
And it's so terrible lol
by Anonymous2 years ago
I've never seen it nor do I wish too lol
by Anonymous2 years ago
Just rewatch the original
by Anonymous2 years ago
I heard that was a thing but luckily dodged seeing it. I'll just use my imagination for how bad that must have been
by Anonymous2 years ago
The first shot of that movie is real, so technically it is live action. But I agree with you.
by Anonymous2 years ago
In WALL-E you have a short video of a real person as one of the captain's, does that make WALL-E a live action movie?
by Anonymous2 years ago
But that just means, like, 0.1% of the movie is live action.
Loads of 'live action' movies have short animated sequences and interludes and no one would call them animated films because of it. So the inverse is true. The Lion King remake is almost entirely CGI animation.
by Anonymous2 years ago
You know , the soviet Treasure Island had some lengthy live action segments, with actors, songs and stuff, but it is still considered an animated movie.
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago
by Anonymous 2 years ago