+166
There is so much opportunity wasted having different sign language for every language. amirite?
by Anonymous1 year ago
Exactly the same opportunities wasted on having different languages.
by Anonymous1 year ago
I imagine it'd be way harder having one universal sign language. Since in English, we don't have word that are in mandarin or Spanish for example.
And regionally you need the people to be able to express their sentence in a language they know.
by Anonymous1 year ago
Especially as technology advances, the written language a deaf person learns can be even more important than the "verbal," one (sign language).
There is debate about this, but as an anecdotal example, since my deaf son left high school, he communicates almost entirely through text, email, discord, etc. to the point that his ASL is getting rusty.
by Anonymous1 year ago
So pretty much like the majority of the world these days really. I'm pretty sure I know married couples who communicate more by text than talk.
by Anonymous1 year ago
While we're at it, we can all learn Esperanto. There are regional differences within ASL, just as there are regional differences in English across the US. You could potentially mostly standardize it worldwide, I guess, but it would drift over time into different dialects.
by Anonymous1 year ago
It's been a while since I took American sign language, but I remember my teacher saying it's all quite similar. I am not sure if that was American dialects, Western world or globally, but many signs are practical so it's possible for international overlap. Also not much for structure. As long as you get your message across.
by Anonymous1 year ago
How are sign languages any different form spoken languages in that regard? Deaf people exist for far longer than the globalization
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago
by Anonymous 1 year ago