+146 Hollywood hasn't been the same ever since Weinstein was taken down, amirite?

by Anonymous 2 years ago

"Here's my inflammatory opinion, but also here's my backdoor escape from being called an asshole." Bravo OP, bravo.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

This is unpopular opinion. i'm fine with being called an asshole don't worry. So let me know why you think I'm an asshole so we can have a real discussion. Cheers

by Anonymous 2 years ago

But A24 exists

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Exactly. There are plenty of films produced independently or by lesser known production companies from all around the world that are a million times better and more entertaining than the mediocre stuff that heathen produced.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

The fact that Weinstein was able to prey on so many women for so long is a testament to the toxic culture that's been allowed to fester in Hollywood. We need to make sure that no one else has to go through what those women did.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Fully agree

by Anonymous 2 years ago

As a talentless actor , I appreciate the fact that I may choose to sleep with my boss to get a job and be famous. Some people choose this real world option, enjoy it, and end up in happy fruitful careers. I'm sure some of the women actually felt lucky for the opportunity.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

What did Weinstein genuinely contribute besides bankrolling the actual creative talent?

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Well that's the job of the producer which he was. Spoting and nurturing talent is a talent in itself.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Theaters have changed in ways that have nothing to do with Weinstein. Teenagers and kids are the only profit to be made. Even the serious oscar nominated movies that used to dominate the last quarter have been pushed aside in favor of kid stuff

by Anonymous 2 years ago

I feel like you've worked backwards to that conclusion like the majority of director and writers he produced are still doing stuff. I don't even think he was as involved as you think like the plot of scream 3 is basically about him yet he produced it.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Can you name one great movie he made? One he had written or directed will be fine. No. Bankrolling a masterpiece doesn't count. Because that's not creative or artistic yourself. That's buying an artist's work or craft. If I buy a Van Gogh painting I don't get to claim I made it. You could. But it would still be incorrect. Even if he wrote 90% of all the greatest movies ever I'd rather burn them and say they'd never exist if you can guarantee me that he didn't do all the horrible things he did.

by Anonymous 2 years ago

Bankrolling a masterpiece does matter, much more than you think. And I m referring to his role as a producer here. I shouldve said a flair for producing great movies.

by Anonymous 2 years ago