Dang, bud. You got me there.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

Words lose weight over time and we start emphasizing them. Centuries ago, "catastrophe" meant something really, really bad, like an earthquake. Nowadays we use "catastrophe" to mean any sort of messy situation. That's just how language evolves.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

Different people choose to use words in different ways. Yes, language evolves, but there's no need to use nonsense words like "over-exaggeration". It's meaningless and stupid.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

I'm not going to argue you on this, but I suggest you read up on the etymology of _above_. Such a simple word, and yet it's built on redundance upon redundance.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

I may or may not look that up. "Above" has five letters and two syllables, so it can't be as ridiculous as "over exaggeration"

by Anonymous 1 year ago

Yeah, you'd think.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

An under-exaggerated observation.

by Anonymous 1 year ago

It's a very stupid word.

by Anonymous 1 year ago