Capitalization and punctuation is like penises: when you put them where they're meant to go it's sexy, but a complete absence of them where they're meant to go...not so much.
The first is iffy, having no holes still hides that beautiful vagina. So it's a one final tease before letting it out. It can be sexy removing the panties with your teeth to then see it.
They have the front pocket, sometimes designed to let you pull it out in some briefs. I have no idea why you would want this, when you could just as easily pull it down. Unless I'm wearing it backwards and you feed a log through that hole
Serious question - why gays need special gay underwear, why just not use women underwear? I understand that there is type of gay underwear that doesn't look like women underwear but there is another type that does.
Calling it 'gay underwear' is a stretch. It's more underwear that a lot of gay men wear because of how 'sexy' it can be. I've known some straight men to wear it, too.
What would you do with your balls in a women's g-string? Or any pair of women's underwear for that matter? The seam on women's underwear is designed to be flat against their skin. Talk about moose knuckle…
Sausage up the middle, the meatballs flopping around on either side. That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it … and it's worked out pretty well so far
With a g string you split it down the middle. With panty style underwear it depends. If they're a bit bigger size you can tuck everything in there and the seams on the sides kinda hold it in. If they're not big enough (or you got some big balls) one of them sticks out the side.
generally womens lingerie and sexier underwear is full of lace and sheer fabrics etc. the sexier its supposed to be the more holes it has. mens underwear usually only has holes cuz they are worn out and therefore much less sexy.
Not if you're gay and get gay underwear
Depends if the women are wearing.mens boxers backwards ...
Tell me you're a straight man without saying you're a straight man.
no thanks.
Every hole in woman's underwear has a story, otherwise the underwear would be thrown away.
Holes in man's underwear has a macho or nerd story. Never be thrown away, waiting to disintegrate.
I disagree with the first part
Do you have first hand experience?
Yes
Do tell, but I agree.
I agree
This is because you're imagining lingerie and not granny panties
Capitalization and punctuation is like penises: when you put them where they're meant to go it's sexy, but a complete absence of them where they're meant to go...not so much.
Surely, like with punctuation and capitalization, it is much worse when they show up uninvited.
i like consistency in pluralites and singularities you like puncutation and penises
we can like different things
There's love without sex and there's sex without love... Then there's You, without either.
How can you have a full beard but not have hair
Nah sis I look hot af with holes 💅
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
Tell me you're straight without telling me you're straight.
Why can women grow babies but not regrow limbs
Growing babies is easier
The first is iffy, having no holes still hides that beautiful vagina. So it's a one final tease before letting it out. It can be sexy removing the panties with your teeth to then see it.
Why do I feel like your username doesn't check out
I don't think any of my exes are dead. I think….
I had to read that 4 times to figure it out lol.
Looks like I need a fashion consultant for my holey undies!
Surely that depends on which sex you're attracted to.
Why?
Well this just isn't true.
Counter example?
Huh?
Example where op's statement is false
Um.. I like cock..?
Depends on your gender…
I am having trouble with this.
what part?
If there's a hole there's a way
Ah the tiny bear print panties she loves so much
Mmm nah I think all holes that weren't there to begin with are kinda gross lol
Designed holes are sexy, rips are not
So men's underwear just need more designed holes to be sexy?
That is a swift No
Of course! Are the holes there on purpose or not? If a lady was wearing crusty, ratty, holey underwear it would also be unattractive.
Ok, but what if they're clean and not crusty, but everything else is true? Old beat up underwear is not the same as crusty dirty underwear lol
These are solid points 👏
I beg to differ id want to get my hands on used panties that were torn lol
Fishnet boxers = the pinnacle of sexy
They have the front pocket, sometimes designed to let you pull it out in some briefs. I have no idea why you would want this, when you could just as easily pull it down. Unless I'm wearing it backwards and you feed a log through that hole
Yes!
There is a very large gay underwear market that proves this (to other gay men, I dunno if women are into it)
Serious question - why gays need special gay underwear, why just not use women underwear? I understand that there is type of gay underwear that doesn't look like women underwear but there is another type that does.
Because women's underwear is for women and men have penises that need to go certain places?
Also, gay men's underwear isn't a 1:1 with women's underwear….
Sounds reasonable
Calling it 'gay underwear' is a stretch. It's more underwear that a lot of gay men wear because of how 'sexy' it can be. I've known some straight men to wear it, too.
Gay mens underwear isn't like women's underwear. It's often jockstraps or the like but fruity/colorful and/or designed to accentuate their packages.
Also yeah women's underwear usually does not have enough space for most men's packages except like boyshorts which are basically boxers for women.
What would you do with your balls in a women's g-string? Or any pair of women's underwear for that matter? The seam on women's underwear is designed to be flat against their skin. Talk about moose knuckle…
Sausage up the middle, the meatballs flopping around on either side. That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it … and it's worked out pretty well so far
With a g string you split it down the middle. With panty style underwear it depends. If they're a bit bigger size you can tuck everything in there and the seams on the sides kinda hold it in. If they're not big enough (or you got some big balls) one of them sticks out the side.
Same rule applies to humans, really
I dunno rips could be hot on a lady
This! lol
crotchless?
I'm gay and I disagree
This is factually incorrect as I have seen my partner in granny pants with a rip hole where her belly button was, it was in fact less sexy.
Sounds like someone has an outtie
You're just straight.
thank you for your reply.
Nah it Depends, alright alright I'll see myself out.
Hey if guys started wearing lacy underwear I sure wouldn't complain
Skidmarks are so damn sexy
Does anyone actually use the dick hole for pissing? I do every once in a long while
Proper punctuation is sexy
Depends on the ho
e
Well… you know… there generally are more holes in womens' underwear….
My other half's kecks look like cafe curtains; it might not be sexy, but at my age I'll settle for endearing.
Some good rips can be in the right place.
Not if they're moth holes 🤣
am i having a stroke what does this mean
generally womens lingerie and sexier underwear is full of lace and sheer fabrics etc. the sexier its supposed to be the more holes it has. mens underwear usually only has holes cuz they are worn out and therefore much less sexy.
Biologically, it makes sense. The majority would say female holes are more sexual than male holes...
No I like it when there's holes in men's underwear for their dicks to peep out.
Good grief give the man a break; he's trying to make a funny