+573 Casino (1995) was tremendously better than Goodfellas (1990) amirite?

by Anonymous 2 months ago

Ahhh, if life was always this good, choose between two masterpieces

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Well all of the depictions of these people are BS since they are lowlife degenerates with rocks for brains and it's Hollywood's job to turn that story into an artistic masterpiece… Casino is a great film though, four star stuff. There is absolutely no doubt about that.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

The mafia wasn't really "degenerate lowlifes" mostly… a lot of people in Boston and NYC liked them, and wanted to be in their neighborhoods. And considering all the money they made and people they bought off, "rocks for brains" seems unfitting as well. Some complicated schemes they pulled off

by Anonymous 3 months ago

I suggest you read "The Luthansa Heist". Based on what Hill claims, most of those guys were dumber than a box of rocks. That is why he and Burke were so successful. They had something resembling competence, which put them head and shoulders above most of the front line guys.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Joe Pesci was brilliant.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Sharon Stone is good enough in casino i don't hate this.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Wrong

by Anonymous 3 months ago

There would be no *Casino* without *Goodfellas* having laid the foundations.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

There would be no movies at all, had the silent pictures not laid those foundations. That doesn't mean the silent pictures are better than what we have today.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

I've watched Goodfellas probably two dozen times; I've watched Casino once and have no interest in seeing it again.

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Maybe you're due a rewatch. In 4k. 😃

by Anonymous 3 months ago

meh, I might as well give it one more chance

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Awesome !!

by Anonymous 3 months ago

Scorsese can't seem to hit the mark like he used to

by Anonymous 3 months ago