+43
Football (or soccer) should be played at 9 vs 9, amirite?
by Anonymous1 week ago
No it shouldn't.
by Anonymous1 week ago
Resistance to change, you must be a fun person
by Anonymous1 week ago
Thinking that your username is not racist, you must be an aggressive person
by Anonymous1 week ago
How is my username racist lmfao??? Thinking that my username has anything to do with race, you must be a 0 IQ person.
by Zleffler1 week ago
Attacking me on my IQ, you must be a person who speaks more than my 6 languages.
by Anonymous1 week ago
Ignoring my question, you must be a person who doesn't use any of those 6 languages to communicate effectively.
by Zleffler1 week ago
One does not engage in an exchange with someone inferior, you must be a person with an inferior intellect
by Anonymous1 week ago
Calling someone else racist while thinking you are superior, we have just gone full circle cause you must be a racist person.
by Zleffler1 week ago
I am going to tell you a secret just because you find it boring, does not mean everybody does. Its not the most popular sport in the world because people think its boring.
by Anonymous1 week ago
So you never Play football full pitch. Now its exhausting. 9 to 9 would be totally mess.
by Successful-Fill-7231 week ago
They'd manage it at high level. Or make matches slightly shorter
by Anonymous1 week ago
The amount of goals per game is increasing almost every year lately... And the quarter finals for the Champions League were absolutely phenomenal. Let this focus on tactics and athleticism cook for a little while longer and see how even more counterplay develops over time.
by ConsequenceBulky1 week ago
Yeah except it's not the case, average goals are not increasing unless you take the C1 elimination matches as a sample
by Anonymous1 week ago
LaLiga going from 2.5 per game to 2.8 per game over the course of 4 years is not an increase? What about the bundesliga reaching some pretty high peaks? Or serie A slowly but surely moving away from the grasps of catenaccio (this has been ongoing for way longer but its still relevant)? Nah, surely there is no general increase in offense. Surely there is less room for skill and individual qualities. Its not like Kevin de Bruyne is anything special with his passes, its all just a system and nothing more. So boring.
by ConsequenceBulky1 week ago
I think most formations would go down to 1 striker and cause a few less goals to be scored, making it a bit more boring. Although I do see how less passing options might mean more riskier long balls and therefore more changes in possession.
by Anonymous1 week ago
Are you aware of TST? They have a way to end the game that I may want to see adapted to the matches
by Anonymous1 week ago
Thick solid tight ?
by Anonymous1 week ago
The Soccer Tournament. Teams like Burnley and Dortmund and Wrexham and Como fly to North Carolina to play a $1mil tournament. They end games on a goal every game, but the way they guarantee that goal is they decrease the players on the field by one every 5 minutes until someone scores. Sounds like something you'd be into.
by Anonymous1 week ago
I think off-site should be ended, kick-in in stead of a throw in.
by Chelsearempel1 week ago
I like the unpopular opinion
by Anonymous1 week ago
don't hate the players, hate the game
by Anonymous1 week ago
There's no space on the field?!!! The pitch needs to be reduced by a third. Maybe there would be some decent scoring
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Zleffler 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Zleffler 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Zleffler 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Successful-Fill-723 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by ConsequenceBulky 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by ConsequenceBulky 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Chelsearempel 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago
by Anonymous 1 week ago