+37 It would be more shocking to expose the light side of Hollywood than the darkside. amirite?

by Anonymous 1 month ago

Harold Ramis was, by every account I've read, a decent and caring human being. Henry Winkler is another. Lloyd Bridges, gracious and kind.

by Anonymous 1 month ago

Keanu Reeves comes to mind

by smithamcathryn 1 month ago

I agree there are outliers. We should treat them by in large as nothing more than hypocrites in their public decrees of goodness and virtue

by Anonymous 1 month ago

Curious what you think of professional sports. There is nothing there but entertainment.

by Anonymous 1 month ago

I love watching some sports. I don't admire athletes beyond what they do athletically.

by Anonymous 1 month ago

Anyone who assumes any good of any celebrity is misguided. That's... a bit of an overstatement. Celebrities are just people. They're complicated and messed up and make mistakes like we all do. To assume they're inherently monstrous with no good qualities is just kind of crazy. but hey offer nothing beyond entertainment, they are no moral or ethical guides. And what exactly are you offering to the world that's so great?

by Anonymous 1 month ago

I work on one of the poorest countries in the world to bring about social change that empowers young people to live better lives. Before that a health care professional working to an extremely high standard

by Anonymous 1 month ago

signed, someone who didn't make it.

by yesenia28 1 month ago

Maybe just treat everyone as an individual?

by OwnTourist971 1 month ago

Well the term is used to convey the facade portrayed in Hollywood; "dark-side" being the reality

by Anonymous 1 month ago