I don't think you're defining anything healthy lmao
by dachguadalupe5 hours ago
At that point it's not a situationship though. The point of calling it a situationship is that it's undefined and ambiguous.
by Anonymous5 hours ago
The problem with situationships is that one person wants more commitment than the other or one of the parties wants no commitment at all.But the person who is more commited usually doesn't know or doesn't wanna see the situation as it is or just hopes that the other party will change their mind somewhen. This is inherently unhealthy
by Immediate_Mammoth8475 hours ago
Can't say I haven't done it but it never once ended well lol
by Automatic-Break-79465 hours ago
If intentions are communicated and understood, sure.
by Blazeswaniawski4 hours ago
But at that point, it's not a situationship. If intentions are clear, it's just a casual hookup. The point of a situationship is that it is ambiguous.
by Anonymous4 hours ago
My horny ass could never
by Anonymous4 hours ago
This sounds like FwB with extra steps
by Anonymous3 hours ago
not even unpopular, just straight trash opinion. Go find Jesus or go to Therapy.
by Anonymous3 hours ago
I feel like having a situationship at some point in your life is healthy just to see what the fuss is about, but NOT ALL RELATIONSHIPS SHOULD BE SITUATIONSHIPS!!! The problem isn't that complicated FWB dynamics exist, it's that EVERYONE is terrified of commitment these days and unless you set up some pretty strict parameters about what you are looking for at the start (narrowing your options down a LOT), chances are, 90% of the romantic and sexual contact you experience will end up being a situationship. And people are rightly sick and tired of it. They are tired of being used, they are tired of being on someone's roster. Most people want monogamy and want commitment at some point, and wasting time in a relationship that's going no where is not fun for anyone.
by Anonymous3 hours ago
couldn't agree more. as long as everyone involved is honest, respectful, and sexually responsible.
by dachguadalupe 5 hours ago
by Anonymous 5 hours ago
by Immediate_Mammoth847 5 hours ago
by Automatic-Break-7946 5 hours ago
by Blazeswaniawski 4 hours ago
by Anonymous 4 hours ago
by Anonymous 4 hours ago
by Anonymous 3 hours ago
by Anonymous 3 hours ago
by Anonymous 3 hours ago
by Wisokycaroline 3 hours ago