Anarchy doesn't mean you can't shoot back.
Good one. Pay attention while fingering their anuses.
What's it like being a moron?
Fake fake fake.
-You hire actors
-You photograph them
-You publish them on a hate site
You ma'am are a pathetic heathen and not a Christian at all
Well said for a Christian woman
The simple fact is that Iran had halted its military uranium enrichment program in 2003. A fact long observed by both the IAEA and CIA. There has been nothing but agreement on that by all 16 Western spy agencies.
What we have to understand is that there had been no subsequent report from anywhere, not the CIA, not the IAEA, not MI6, nothing at all indicating that anything in weapons development has happened in the last 12 years.
Every piece of evidence presented since then not only backed up this report but indicated increasing openness on the part of Iran to disclose more aspects of a nuclear program that had already been under a very high level of inspection for some time.
What does this mean about the current agreement?
Well, for sure there are domestic political issues in the United States. The agreement with Iran to save the world from a nuclear attack by a nation with no nuclear program and no nuclear weapons is certainly quite an accomplishment, right up there with the American and British cleansing of Iraq of their non-existent weapons of mass destruction.
What is the real aftermath likely to look like?
First of all, if you are a hotel owner in Tehran, the already heavy influx of western business executives to not only open the door to oil trading, but for Iran's $Billions in frozen assets. Iran will become a major economic market much like Saudi Arabia.
ISIS and those standing behind that organization, nominally Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey, can expect major international losses in both economic prestige and market share which explains why they are so vehemently against this deal.
With Russia’s prestigious reputation for securing Iran from Israeli and Saudi attack no longer a “valuable” commodity the need a new stimulous which they will find in when Iran's cash flow suddenly improves and it is "payback" time. As the already established vendor for much of Iran's markets Russia will recieve a huge influx of new orders.
Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states will start buying multiple copies of F 35 and F 15s to shore up their defenses against the non-threat of Iran's non-existent air force so Lockheed will experience a huge windfall along with the rest of the US military industrial complex. Russia hopes to unload a few hundred Sukhoi T50s to those "partners" as well.
Oh well, it is always about corporate greed and never about saving lives.
Gee Mr. Loner, up here in New York we learn that about the third grade. Sounds like you folks south of the border have finally learned one of the basics of logical thinking. Better be careful or your post will actually start making sense.
It is doubtful it will work even then. The only "ism" that makes any sense at all is anarchism.
Any attempt at private ownership is contrary to the utility of the whole.
And so you will continue to believe, until you have a better understanding of how humans conception of "ownership" has caused a deviation in the role of humans within the ecosystem, so that we are now no more than a cancer on this earth.
Not who, what. The earth itself got stolen from.
This post is not a moral judgment of people. I agree some rich people are nice and fair. This post is a condemnation of property. The concept of property is a misguided understanding of the laws of nature. We cannot "own" things. Anyone who claims to own their wealth has stole it from the earth. They have taken it from its intended purpose, to be shared by the inhabitants of the earth. The bounty of the earth is not to be kept for the sole benefit of any individual. That is what I meant.
This is bad science
Any effort to kill our men and women uniform under the pretense of "defending this country" is a ploy to make the rich richer. If the enemy is not marching across our borders then we do not need to send our troop anywhere, especially to kill and to be killed. Sending our citizen to foreign soil to fight someone else's war is asinine. Vic is right, we have the capability to use drones and long range missiles to destroy any target 10,000 over. Why would you think we need more people in uniform? You complain about foreign aid? Really? What the heck do you think spending $billions on troops to fight in a foreign country is? an investment?
This is fake, and so are you for posting anonymously. You are a troll.