I replied to a different part and didn't realize it just sent my comment right to the end, where he'd already addressed what I said. But hey, thanks for informing me of something I already knew.
Or maybe she cares enough to let you have the experience yourself. My mom is the only person I trust completely; she's my best friend. She knows when to be a parent and when to be my friend, but she also knows that I need to make my own decisions and have my own experiences. Mothers who let their daughters do whatever they want aren't necessarily "bad parents" and it doesn't mean they don't care. Girls, or really anyone in general, will end up making whatever decision they want, regardless of input from their parents. It's definitely easier to admit a mistake and attempt to fix it when you have support from your parents, instead of constantly hearing "I told you so" when they try to get help.
I agree that the government doesn't have the right to do this, just because the government isnt given the right to control propaganda for companies by the constitution. All this really boils down to is the interpretation of the constitution: strict or loose. The government likes to tie the interpretation problem to emotionally driven issues, and a lot of people are blind to what the government is actually doing because all they want to focus on is what affects them right then and there. The government is doing the same thing with gay marriage. The constitution doesn't specifically give the government the right to allow or prohibit things such as gay marriage, but if any laws for or against it are passed nationally, it'll give the federal government more power over the people in the long run.
If they know the harmful effects smoking has on them and they still don't care and continue to smoke, then putting pictures of possible dangers on cigarette packages won't make a difference either.
Not really. In those "authorized vehicle only" things on the side of the road where the police like to hide with their radar guns, they're more likely to catch you speeding in the lane closest to them versus someone in the middle or right lane speeding.
Point is, just because you're driving in the fast lane, doesn't mean you're entitled to special treatment, so you don't get to go faster than the speed limit.
Of course you have the right to do anything but most people don't want to listen to someone complaining when they refuse to do something that is entirely possible to fix their situation.
Never thought of that!
Or "There's a Good Reason These Tables Are Numbered Honey, You Just Haven't Thought Of It Yet"
There is one... Most times they're in small complexes or apartments. It's really for like 2 or 3 outfits, but one could work just as well.
I replied to a different part and didn't realize it just sent my comment right to the end, where he'd already addressed what I said. But hey, thanks for informing me of something I already knew.
Or maybe she cares enough to let you have the experience yourself. My mom is the only person I trust completely; she's my best friend. She knows when to be a parent and when to be my friend, but she also knows that I need to make my own decisions and have my own experiences. Mothers who let their daughters do whatever they want aren't necessarily "bad parents" and it doesn't mean they don't care. Girls, or really anyone in general, will end up making whatever decision they want, regardless of input from their parents. It's definitely easier to admit a mistake and attempt to fix it when you have support from your parents, instead of constantly hearing "I told you so" when they try to get help.
I agree that the government doesn't have the right to do this, just because the government isnt given the right to control propaganda for companies by the constitution. All this really boils down to is the interpretation of the constitution: strict or loose. The government likes to tie the interpretation problem to emotionally driven issues, and a lot of people are blind to what the government is actually doing because all they want to focus on is what affects them right then and there. The government is doing the same thing with gay marriage. The constitution doesn't specifically give the government the right to allow or prohibit things such as gay marriage, but if any laws for or against it are passed nationally, it'll give the federal government more power over the people in the long run.
If they know the harmful effects smoking has on them and they still don't care and continue to smoke, then putting pictures of possible dangers on cigarette packages won't make a difference either.
Sure women shouldn't, but we do anyways. Sometimes it's just easier that way.
That is the most depressingly true comparison I've ever heard.
They're gross either way...
Not really. In those "authorized vehicle only" things on the side of the road where the police like to hide with their radar guns, they're more likely to catch you speeding in the lane closest to them versus someone in the middle or right lane speeding.
Point is, just because you're driving in the fast lane, doesn't mean you're entitled to special treatment, so you don't get to go faster than the speed limit.
I was too lazy to read "you are lazy" so I read "you're lazy" …
Of course you have the right to do anything but most people don't want to listen to someone complaining when they refuse to do something that is entirely possible to fix their situation.
Myhipusername