this is true for all pregnancy actually. in a place where women are educated and have the same rights as men, they're more likely to both have less children and have them later in life.
okayokay. im jumping into this to just point one thing out. gays are simply attracted to someone of their own sex. maybe they're in love. maybe they just want to fuck and run. whatever. either way, their state of mind is the same as anyone elses. things like nectophilia, pedophilia, etc are PARAPHILES, conditions charactarized by intense, constant, controlling fantasies and urges about the object of their desire. they are possessed by it to the point of irrationality. the health of a homosexual's mind is just as good as that of a hetero or bisexual's, but is incomparable to the health of the mind of a paraphile. that is a difference. on a side note, id like to inquire what you know about what god wants. i have tea and biscuits with him every thursday afternoon (jesus attends occasionally when hes not busy appearing on burnt toast) and he told me he adored gays. in fact, he created them because the world was lacking in interior design and fat girl bffs. thats all.
well disorder pretty much means not in order, as in not functioning correctly. so technically sure, homosexuality may be a disorder. but then again, so are a lot of things. there are a whole fucktruckload of disorders in the world. but that doesn't mean one can juxtapose and compare them as equals. with all due respect, i still disagree with you on your opinion that they shouldnt be compared because of the absence of consent. the mental state of a man/woman who loves and has a healthy relationship with someone who happens to be of the same sex is completely different than say the mental state of a person who takes sexual advantage of a young child who he/she had been stalking for a month. it's like apples to oranges.
im aware. ive read it. and frankly i think it sucks. in my opinion, people who read things that suck are weird. im sure youre very accomplished and your hair smells nice, but i cant fathom why of all the multifarious written matter in the world, one would choose that piece of crap.
the lack of consent is definitely a difference, but not what i was going for. I agree that homosexuality may be some sort of mental imbalance (although to be honest i don't think so). I'm sure there are studies being done and if you researched it you might learn more. BUT. it is still a sexual orientation. not a paraphilia, like necrophilia, masochism, etc, where the sufferer is OBSESSED with the particular object or behavior to the point of dependency. They have recurrent, intense fantasies and can hardly think of anything else. That's the difference.
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~Epicurus
im not debating the amount of damage terrorists inflict. it is without question a lot. im just pointing out that there is no logic in confiscating the rights of hundreds of millions of people because a few (yes, a few) of them have items lodged in their rectums, regardless of how much damage the select few are causing. and in any case i doubt red alerts go off whenever you step into an airport because you happen to look sort of like an arab (and because im full of statistics, only 20% of muslims are arabs and there are more christian arabs than there are jews in the whole world), so the liberty isn't really yours to hand over.
this is true for all pregnancy actually. in a place where women are educated and have the same rights as men, they're more likely to both have less children and have them later in life.
there is a lot more to history than just wars... and there is a lot more to war than just guns.
i echo what the poster preceding me said. get a clue.
fucker. thanks.
ohh.
okayokay. im jumping into this to just point one thing out. gays are simply attracted to someone of their own sex. maybe they're in love. maybe they just want to fuck and run. whatever. either way, their state of mind is the same as anyone elses. things like nectophilia, pedophilia, etc are PARAPHILES, conditions charactarized by intense, constant, controlling fantasies and urges about the object of their desire. they are possessed by it to the point of irrationality. the health of a homosexual's mind is just as good as that of a hetero or bisexual's, but is incomparable to the health of the mind of a paraphile. that is a difference. on a side note, id like to inquire what you know about what god wants. i have tea and biscuits with him every thursday afternoon (jesus attends occasionally when hes not busy appearing on burnt toast) and he told me he adored gays. in fact, he created them because the world was lacking in interior design and fat girl bffs. thats all.
well disorder pretty much means not in order, as in not functioning correctly. so technically sure, homosexuality may be a disorder. but then again, so are a lot of things. there are a whole fucktruckload of disorders in the world. but that doesn't mean one can juxtapose and compare them as equals. with all due respect, i still disagree with you on your opinion that they shouldnt be compared because of the absence of consent. the mental state of a man/woman who loves and has a healthy relationship with someone who happens to be of the same sex is completely different than say the mental state of a person who takes sexual advantage of a young child who he/she had been stalking for a month. it's like apples to oranges.
im aware. ive read it. and frankly i think it sucks. in my opinion, people who read things that suck are weird. im sure youre very accomplished and your hair smells nice, but i cant fathom why of all the multifarious written matter in the world, one would choose that piece of crap.
of course not. but that doesnt make you less of a weirdfuck....
the lack of consent is definitely a difference, but not what i was going for. I agree that homosexuality may be some sort of mental imbalance (although to be honest i don't think so). I'm sure there are studies being done and if you researched it you might learn more. BUT. it is still a sexual orientation. not a paraphilia, like necrophilia, masochism, etc, where the sufferer is OBSESSED with the particular object or behavior to the point of dependency. They have recurrent, intense fantasies and can hardly think of anything else. That's the difference.
nononononononononono
i dont fucking know!
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~Epicurus
yeah. whatever.
im not debating the amount of damage terrorists inflict. it is without question a lot. im just pointing out that there is no logic in confiscating the rights of hundreds of millions of people because a few (yes, a few) of them have items lodged in their rectums, regardless of how much damage the select few are causing. and in any case i doubt red alerts go off whenever you step into an airport because you happen to look sort of like an arab (and because im full of statistics, only 20% of muslims are arabs and there are more christian arabs than there are jews in the whole world), so the liberty isn't really yours to hand over.
wait, the game or the interjection?